性别的法理学思考
发布时间:2018-06-06 20:35
本文选题:性别 + 女权主义 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文通过对社会性别内涵的分析,以女权主义法学的理论为基础,初步分析了当前对男女平等保护的不足,借鉴女权主义法学的平等与差异观的发展,提出在实质平等层面切实保障我国男女平等的实现的些许对策。文章除前言和结尾外,共分四部分: 第一部分:法学研究下的性别概念。本部分阐述了社会性别理论的产生、发展及其内涵,分析了社会性别理论对于研究两性平等问题的理论意义和实践意义。关于社会性别理论的阐述是女权主义理论的重要成果,以此为切入点,可以帮助我们了解女权主义法学关于性别法律关系的相关理论,批判性地借鉴其理论成果,对于我国的社会性别研究有着积极意义。 第二部分:性别的历史和现状。本部分介绍了中西方关于男女两性问题在法律上的历史发展情况,介绍了女性权利保护的历史背景,通过了解相关背景,可以帮助我们展望女性权利保护的走向。指出当前社会仍广泛存在歧视女性的性别冲突,这种历史和现状,说明男女平等保护的实现任重道远。 第三部分:美国女权主义法学的平等与差异观。本部分介绍了美国女权主义法学的平等差异观,这是女权主义法学的核心理论。总结了美国女权主义法学的基本发展过程,对影响各个流派的学术渊源作了简要分析。通过对女权主义法学不同时期的平等差异观的比较,认识到了平等差异观的理论在发展中不断进步。女权主义法学通过对“平等”、“差异”概念的内涵的不断扩展,力图打破“差异困境”所带来的障碍从对男女平等的追求上升到全人类的全面平等。通过对女权主义法学的平等与差异观的分析,试图从中找到对于我国男女平等保护的借鉴意义,对女性无差别对待还是特殊对待,采取何种平等差异观,也是我国法律界面临和关注的问题。 第四部分:提出性别正义是实现男女实质平等的途径。本部分提出了“性别正义”是打破单纯的“男女平等”局限,更加量化切实地保障男女平等实现的概念。强调在立法中进行性别分析,进行现实化的社会性别分析,完成从形式平等到实质平等的观念的转变。在法律领域中运用社会性别的概念,在立法过程中充分考虑并衡量到社会性别的影响,以实现性别正义和促进女性发展为目标完善现有立法。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of feminist jurisprudence, this paper analyzes the deficiency of the protection of equality between men and women, and draws lessons from the development of equality and difference in feminist jurisprudence. This paper puts forward some countermeasures to ensure the realization of equality between men and women in China on the level of substantive equality. In addition to the preface and the end, the article is divided into four parts: the first part: the concept of gender under the study of law. This part describes the emergence, development and connotation of gender theory, and analyzes the theoretical and practical significance of gender theory for the study of gender equality. The elaboration of social gender theory is an important achievement of feminist theory, which can help us to understand the relevant theories of feminist jurisprudence on gender legal relations, and critically draw lessons from its theoretical achievements. The second part: the history and present situation of gender. This part introduces the historical development of Chinese and Western gender issues in law, and introduces the historical background of the protection of women's rights. Through understanding the relevant background, we can help us to look forward to the trend of the protection of women's rights. The author points out that the gender conflict of discrimination against women still exists widely in the society at present. This kind of history and present situation shows that the realization of equal protection of men and women has a long way to go. Part three: the equality and difference view of American feminist jurisprudence. This part introduces the equality difference view of American feminist jurisprudence, which is the core theory of feminist jurisprudence. This paper summarizes the basic development process of American feminist law, and makes a brief analysis of its academic origin. Through the comparison of the views of equality difference in different periods of feminist jurisprudence, it is recognized that the theory of equality difference is progressing continuously in the course of development. Through the expansion of the connotation of the concepts of "equality" and "difference", feminist jurisprudence tries to break down the obstacles brought by the "dilemma of difference" from the pursuit of equality between men and women to the overall equality of all mankind. Through the analysis of the equality and difference view of feminist jurisprudence, this paper tries to find out the significance of the protection of equality between men and women in our country, whether there is no discrimination or special treatment for women, and what kind of equal difference view is adopted. The fourth part puts forward that gender justice is the way to realize the substantive equality of men and women. This part puts forward that "gender justice" is a concept that breaks the limitation of "equality between men and women" and guarantees the realization of equality between men and women in a more quantitative and practical way. Emphasis is placed on gender analysis and realistic gender analysis in legislation so as to change the concept from formal equality to substantive equality. The concept of gender is applied in the legal field, and the influence of gender is fully considered and measured in the legislative process, with the goal of achieving gender justice and promoting the development of women to perfect the existing legislation.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 吕世伦,范季海;美国女权主义法学述论[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1998年01期
2 刘霓;社会性别——西方女性主义理论的中心概念[J];国外社会科学;2001年06期
3 李慧英,郏磊,王黎芳;关于社会性别与公共政策问题研讨综述[J];理论前沿;2001年23期
4 张清;;性别正义:迈向宪治的社会性别[J];法制与社会发展;2009年01期
5 刘莉;李慧英;;公共政策决策与社会性别意识[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2003年03期
6 全国维护妇女儿童权益协调组;《中华人民共和国妇女权益保障法》实施情况调查报告[J];中国妇运;2003年02期
7 周安平;社会性别的法律建构及其批判[J];中国法学;2004年06期
8 杜洁;女性主义与社会性别分析──社会性别理论在发展中的运用[J];浙江学刊;2000年02期
,本文编号:1988021
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1988021.html