职务发明奖酬合理性原则研究——以日本专利法为借鉴

发布时间：2018-06-18 00:58

本文选题：职务发明 + 奖酬　；参考：《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：单位向发明人支付职务发明奖酬应当遵循合理性原则,从而实现两者之间利益的平衡。法院在适用该原则时,可以对当事人之间约定的奖酬进行事后审查,或者在没有约定及约定不合理时予以事前认定。事后审查偏重于程序性规制,而事前认定则偏重于实体性要求。我国应当借鉴日本经验,在《专利法》第四次修改时进一步明确"合理利益"要求。为完善对当事人约定奖酬的审查,要改进合理性原则的立法体例、充分尊重当事人约定奖酬的意思自治、明确约定奖酬合理性审查的程序性标准。为提升合理奖酬的司法裁定质量,不应将法定标准作为合理奖酬标准以及过度提高法定奖酬比例,应当明确认定合理奖酬数额的影响因素。由此,可以保障单位与发明人双方围绕职务发明所享有的合理利益。
[Abstract]:The unit should follow the principle of reasonableness to pay the inventor the job invention award, so as to achieve the balance between the interests of the two. When applying the principle, the court may review the agreed reward between the parties after the event, or decide in advance when the agreement is not agreed and unreasonable. Ex post-examination focuses on procedural regulation and prior determination on substantive requirements. China should draw lessons from Japan's experience and further clarify the requirements of "reasonable interests" in the fourth revision of the Patent Law. In order to perfect the examination of the parties' agreement on reward, we should improve the legislative system of the principle of rationality, fully respect the autonomy of the parties' intention of agreeing on the reward and pay, and make clear the procedural standard for the examination of the reasonableness of the agreed reward. In order to improve the quality of judicial adjudication of reasonable reward, the legal standard should not be regarded as the standard of reasonable reward and the proportion of legal reward should be raised too much, and the influencing factors of the amount of reasonable reward should be clearly identified. Thus, the reasonable benefits enjoyed by both the unit and the inventor in relation to the invention can be guaranteed.
【作者单位】：中南大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会部级法学研究项目“职务发明奖酬法律问题研究”(CLS(2016)D132) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(30916014111)
【分类号】：D931.3;DD913

【相似文献】