中日防止商标抢注法律制度的比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-25 07:26

本文选题：商标 + 商标抢注　；参考：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：商标不仅具有识别商品来源的作用,对于经营者来说,商标更是一笔无形的资产,一笔宝贵的财富。正因为商标蕴含着巨大价值,些基于不正当目的的抢注者企图通过商标抢注行为来牟取巨额利益。现在商标抢注行为不仅仅在中国,在世界各个国家都呈现出了多样化、复杂化的趋势,成为各国商标保护所面临的严峻问题之一本文选择中国和日本作为对象,对中日两国的“防止商标抢注法律制度”进行比较研究。因为中日两国既是《巴黎公约》的成员国,又是世界贸易组织的成员,都按照《巴黎公约》和TRIPS协议的要求提供对商标的相关保护,所以两国在商标保护的有关规定上相对来说比较接近。另一方面,日本的《商标法》和《不正当竞争防止法》的实施都早于中国,并且为了灵活应对科技、经济、社会的巨大变化,有效解决不断出现的新问题,日本一直频繁地修改其商标相关法律。通过比较可以学习借鉴日本的一些有价值的理论,有助于中国更好地完善防止商标抢注的法律制度。本文共分为四个部分。第一部分“关于商标抢注的基本问题”。本文首先对商标的概念、商标的作用、商标抢注的概念、商标抢注的类型进行梳理。因为商标具有重要作用,商标所有人才会付出巨大努力不断积累并提高商标信誉；同时商标抢注人正是看到了商标对于其所有人的巨大价值,才会通过抢注的行为以达到快速牟取不正当利益的目的。所以为了更好地保护商标所有人、保护消费者的合法权益,有必要不断完善我国防止商标抢注行为的法律制度。通过第一部分的梳理也阐明了本文创作的主要目的。第二部分“中日商标审查评审流程中防止商标抢注制度的比较分析”。本文将“商标审查评审流程”单独列为一个部分进行中日两国防止商标抢注法律制度的比较研究,是想更深入地介绍和分析日本在这方面的一些独特的法律制度。首先,分析了中国商标审查评审流程中防止商标抢注的制度；然后介绍分析了日本的相关制度,特别是日本独具特色的制度；最后,针对中日两国商标审查评审流程中具有共性的制度、各自拥有特点的制度分别进行了比较分析。第三部分“中日防止商标抢注其他法律规定的比较分析”。首先,以中日《商标法》中防止商标抢注的有关规定为对象进行分析；然后,对中日《反不正当竞争法》中防止商标抢注的规定进行比较分析。第四部分“完善我国防止商标抢注相关法律制度的思考”。在前述比较研究的基础上,本文针对“我国商标审查评审流程中防止商标抢注的有关制度”、“《商标法》中防止商标抢注的其他相关规定”以及“《反不正当竞争法》的有关规定”提出了一些具体的完善建议。本文在创作过程中收集了大量关于日本商标审查评审流程以及日本商标法律相关规定的资料,介绍了一些日本防止商标抢注的具有特色的法律制度。通过比较研究,希望能够对完善中国防止商标抢注的相关法律制度起到一定的借鉴作用。
[Abstract]:The trademark not only has the function of identifying the source of the commodity, but for the operator, the trademark is more an intangible asset and a valuable wealth. It is because the trademark contains great value, and some unjustified preempters attempt to make a huge profit through the act of trademark snatch. All countries in the world have shown the trend of diversification and complexity, and become one of the serious problems facing trademark protection in various countries.
In this paper, China and Japan are selected as the object of the comparative study of the "legal system for preventing trademark snatch" between China and Japan. Since China and Japan are members of the Paris Convention and members of the world trade organization, they all protect the trademark in accordance with the requirements of the "Paris Convention" and the TRIPS agreement, so the two countries are in the trademark protection. The relevant provisions of protection are relatively close. On the other hand, the implementation of the trademark law and the Unfair Competition Prevention Law in Japan is earlier than that of China, and in order to cope with the great changes in science and technology, economy and society, and effectively solve the emerging problems, Japan has been constantly revising its trademark related laws. Learning from Japan's valuable theories will help China better improve the legal system to prevent trademark rush registration.
This article is divided into four parts.
The first part is about the basic problems of trademark snatch. Firstly, the concept of trademark, the role of trademark, the concept of trademark snatch, the type of trademark snatch are combed. Because the trademark has an important role, the trademark owners will make great efforts to accumulate and improve the reputation of the trademark; at the same time, the trademark snatch people are seeing it. In order to protect the owner of the trademark and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the consumers, it is necessary to improve the legal system of our country to prevent the trademark snatch in order to better protect the trademark owners and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the consumers. The main purpose of creation.
The second part is "the comparative analysis of the system of preventing trademark registration in the process of Trademark Review and review in China and Japan". This paper makes a comparative study of the "trademark review and review process" as a part of the legal system of preventing trademark snatch from China and Japan. It is intended to introduce and analyze some unique legal systems in Japan in a more in-depth way. First, it analyzes the system of preventing trademark registration in China's trademark review and review process, and then introduces and analyzes the related system in Japan, especially the unique system in Japan. Finally, the system which has common characteristics in the process of Trademark Review and evaluation in China and Japan is compared and analyzed respectively.
The third part is "the comparative analysis of other legal provisions on preventing trademark snatch by China and Japan". First, the article analyzes the relevant provisions of the Sino Japanese trademark law to prevent trademark snatch from the trademark, and then makes a comparative analysis on the provisions of the anti unfair competition law in China and Japan for preventing trademark snatch.
In the fourth part, "perfecting our country's legal system for preventing trademark registration". On the basis of the previous comparative study, this article aims at "relevant regulations on preventing trademark registration in the process of Trademark Review and appraisal in our country", "other relevant regulations on preventing trademark snatch in the Trademark Law" and the relevant regulations of "Anti Unfair Competition Law". Some concrete suggestions are put forward.
In the process of creation, this article collected a great deal of information about the review process of the Japanese Trademark Review and the relevant regulations of the Japanese trademark law, and introduced some characteristic legal systems in Japan to prevent the trademark snatch from the trademark. Through comparative study, it is hoped that it can be used as a reference for the improvement of the relevant legal system of China's prevention of trademark snatch. Effect.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D931.3;D922.294;D923.43

【参考文献】