当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

农村多元纠纷解决机制构建研究

发布时间:2018-07-03 13:37

  本文选题:社会转型期 + 农村 ; 参考:《西北农林科技大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:依法治国是构建社会主义和谐社会的基本要求和重要途径,也是维护农村社会稳定,大力发展农村经济建设的重要保障。本论文立足于社会转型期农村的现面临的时代背景,对农村社会纠纷的类型成因进行了分析总结,,并寻求有效化解农村社会纠纷的机制、方式与途径,为社会主义新农村建设提供重要的制度保障。本论文大体分为三个部分: 第一部分我国正处于社会转型时期,农村的矛盾纠纷既有传统的像土地纠纷、婚姻家庭纠纷、邻里纠纷等农村常见的纠纷,也包括新型的农村纠纷像随着市场经济发展和农村城市化进程加快,日益凸显和增多的农村纠纷,城市化重点工程建设中引发的农村社会纠纷,因环境污染问题引发的农村社会纠纷。从法律文化的理念、农村纠纷双方关系亲疏、农业生产收入水平、纠纷的影响及公众舆论和成本与收益的比值等多个方面探讨了如何正确选择纠纷解决方式的相关影响因素。从非诉讼纠纷解决方式符合新农村建设要求、诉讼纠纷解决方式在广大农村地区应进一步发展两方面充分分析了农村纠纷解决方式多元化的必要性和可行性。要充分考虑传统的非诉讼纠纷解决方式和诉讼纠纷解决方式各自的优势和不足,把二者很好的结合起来,使纠纷解决的各种方式都充分发挥各自的作用,只有这样才能有效的处理农村社会纠纷,维护农村社会的稳定。 第二部分主要介绍农村各种矛盾的存在成因,解决手段的优缺点,从而把诉讼与非诉讼的多元纠纷解决机制产生的背景,产生的社会基础和必要、前提条件以及该纠纷解决机制在化解农村多种矛盾中的优势和作用进行了详细阐述和研究。本中重点对法院特别是基层法庭在农村纠纷解决中的重要性进行了研究,因法院在整个社会矛盾化解中的不可替代性及化解矛盾的专业性和规范性使得这一组织在化解农村各类矛盾中具有保障和指导作用。同时也介绍了农村诉讼与非诉讼相衔接多元纠纷解决方式的构建。首先解析了农村纠纷诉讼与非诉讼解决方式的领域划分与衔接点确定,然后分析了非诉讼纠纷解决方式中人民调解的重要意义,以及构建多无化纠纷解决机制所必须的法治宣传,介绍了构建这一纠纷解决方式应有的制度等保障。 第三部分主要介绍了对农村转型时期诉讼与非诉讼相衔接的多元纠纷解决机制在现阶段农村基层地区的构建是符合政府在农村的基本政策的,是与政府构建和谐农村的总基调相一致的。在农村各种传统及新型矛盾不断涌现的今天,这一纠纷解决机制需要更有力的推广和完善。既需要党委政府的高度重视,加大投入,加强保障,更需要人民群众的大力支持,自觉运用,和不断促进。
[Abstract]:Ruling the country according to law is the basic requirement and important way to build a harmonious socialist society, and it is also an important guarantee for maintaining the stability of rural society and developing rural economic construction. This paper is based on the background of the rural areas in the social transition period, analyzes and summarizes the causes of the rural social disputes, and looks for the mechanism, ways and means of effectively resolving the rural social disputes. It will provide important system guarantee for the construction of new socialist countryside. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part of our country is in the period of social transformation, the contradictions and disputes in rural areas, such as traditional disputes such as land disputes, marriage and family disputes, neighborhood disputes and other common disputes in rural areas. It also includes the new type of rural disputes such as the increasingly prominent and increasing rural disputes with the development of the market economy and the accelerated process of rural urbanization, and the rural social disputes caused by the construction of the key projects of urbanization. Rural social disputes caused by environmental pollution. From the legal culture concept, the relationship between the two sides of the rural dispute, the income level of agricultural production, the influence of the dispute and the ratio of public opinion and cost to income, this paper probes into the relevant factors of how to choose the right way of dispute resolution. The necessity and feasibility of diversification of dispute resolution in rural areas are analyzed from two aspects: the non-litigation dispute settlement way conforms to the requirements of new rural construction and the litigation dispute resolution method should be further developed in the vast rural areas. It is necessary to fully consider the advantages and disadvantages of traditional non-litigation dispute resolution methods and litigation dispute resolution methods, and combine the two very well, so that all kinds of dispute resolution methods can give full play to their respective roles. Only in this way can we effectively deal with rural social disputes and maintain the stability of rural society. The second part mainly introduces the causes of the existence of various contradictions in rural areas, the advantages and disadvantages of the means of settlement, so as to bring about the background, the social basis and the necessity of the multivariate dispute resolution mechanism between litigation and non-litigation. The preconditions and the advantages and functions of the dispute resolution mechanism in resolving various contradictions in rural areas are elaborated and studied in detail. This paper focuses on the importance of courts, especially grass-roots courts, in rural dispute resolution. Due to the irreplaceable nature of the court in resolving the social contradictions and the specialization and standardization of resolving the contradictions, this organization plays a role of guarantee and guidance in resolving all kinds of contradictions in rural areas. At the same time, it also introduces the construction of the multi-party dispute settlement mode. First of all, it analyzes the division of areas and the determination of connecting points between rural dispute litigation and non-litigation settlement, and then analyzes the important significance of people's mediation in non-litigation dispute resolution. The necessary publicity of rule of law and the guarantee of constructing the system of dispute settlement are introduced. The third part mainly introduces the multivariate dispute resolution mechanism, which links litigation and non-litigation in the period of rural transformation. At the present stage, the construction of rural grass-roots areas is in line with the basic policies of the government in rural areas. It is consistent with the overall tone of the government's construction of a harmonious countryside. With the emergence of various traditional and new contradictions in rural areas, the dispute resolution mechanism needs to be popularized and improved. It is necessary to attach great importance to the Party Committee and government, to increase investment, to strengthen security, and to make full use of and constantly promote the efforts of the masses.
【学位授予单位】:西北农林科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D422.6;D920.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 洪浩;;非讼方式:农村民事纠纷解决的主要途径[J];法学;2006年11期

2 李长健;曹俊;王妍;;基于农民权益保护的非讼机制[J];天水行政学院学报;2007年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 秦卫俊;苏南农村城市化进程中矛盾化解的法理学思考[D];上海社会科学院;2008年



本文编号:2093835

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2093835.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f8629***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com