美国专利权穷竭制度及其借鉴
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the patent system in China, after more than 20 years of development, it has made great achievements in perfecting patent legislation and strengthening the level of patent protection. However, a truly perfect patent protection system should also contain legitimate restrictions on patent rights. Compared with the developed countries represented by the United States, China still needs to make more efforts in patent limitation. As one of the systems that restrict patent rights, the exhaustion of patent rights is developed from the theory of implied license and plays an important role in the defense of patent infringement in the United States. The patent exhaustion system was first established in the United States through the case law. After more than one hundred years of development, its content has changed a lot. In 2008, the United States Supreme Court's judgment on Quanta case once again expanded the scope of application of patent exhaustion system. The development course and contents of the patent exhaustion system in the United States have a good reference significance for our country: on the one hand, the phenomenon of patent jungle is very serious, which seriously affects the development of enterprises; on the other hand, since China's entry into the World Trade Organization, Trade barriers have changed from tariff barriers to intellectual property barriers, and patent has become a powerful measure to suppress the import and export trade of Chinese enterprises. By studying the practice of the United States and properly expanding the scope of application of the patent exhaustion system in China, the patent system of our country can be perfected, and the ability of Chinese enterprises to deal with patent infringement litigation can be improved, thus protecting the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises. In this paper, the author will introduce the specific content of patent right, the development course and essence of patent exhaustion system, and use case analysis to introduce the patent exhaustion system in the United States. It is concluded that the condition of expanding the scope of application of patent exhaustion is that the components of the sold patent product contain the substantive technical characteristics of the exhausted patent and have no other non-infringing uses. It is put forward that exhaustion of patent right and implied license are two kinds of different defenses in patent infringement litigation in the United States, and the applicable conditions of exhaustion of patent right can be eliminated under the condition of restriction after sale in the United States. Combined with our country's legislative and judicial practice, this paper summarizes the applicable conditions and existing problems of patent exhaustion system in our country.
【学位授予单位】:北京化工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D923.42;D971.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王晓浒;刘磊;;三成专利权人表示遭遇过侵权[J];中国发明与专利;2011年07期
2 吴宁扬;;专利侵权判断原则刍议[J];江苏科技信息;2011年05期
3 杨明;;专利权质押贷款的可操作性难题及其应对[J];电子知识产权;2011年08期
4 杨延超;;为专利权质押正名[J];电子知识产权;2011年07期
5 陈悦;;我国专利权的行政保护浅析[J];现代交际;2011年08期
6 陈悦;;论如何完善我国专利权滥用的反垄断法规制度[J];商业文化(上半月);2011年09期
7 杨红军;赵加兵;;专利权权利用尽原则研究[J];公民与法(法学版);2011年07期
8 和育东;;专利政策目标的一元化[J];科学学研究;2011年08期
9 刘远山;余秀宝;蔡清明;;我国专利权投资入股论要——以《公司法》的规定为视角[J];海南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
10 邱长生;;对石屏县专利权保护工作的分析及建议[J];云南科技管理;2011年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 马放;;专利权用尽与专利产品平行进口[A];专利法研究(1999)[C];1999年
2 姚兵兵;;专利权人恶意利用不当专利诉讼问题实证研究——兼评《专利法》第三次修改的部分条款[A];专利法研究(2008)[C];2009年
3 李娜;;海峡两岸专利权行政救济之比较[A];专利法研究(2000)[C];2000年
4 张晓霞;;专利侵权诉讼中合同抗辩效力的认定[A];专利法研究(1997)[C];1997年
5 刘立平;;再谈专利产品的平行进口与专利权的国际用尽论——析日本最高法院1997年7月1日“BBS铝制车轮”三审判决案[A];专利法研究(1998)[C];1998年
6 蒋贤起;;使用专利权用尽纾解平行进口难题[A];实施国家知识产权战略,,促进专利代理行业发展-2010年中华全国专利代理人协会年会暨首届知识产权论坛论文集[C];2010年
7 徐棣枫;厉宁;;试论滥用专利权——专利领域中的反垄断问题研究[A];专利法研究(1999)[C];1999年
8 白光清;;专利侵权抗辩研究[A];专利法研究(2001)[C];2001年
9 尹新天;;专利权的国际用尽及平行进口问题[A];专利法研究(2003)[C];2003年
10 张寒;;浅析专利权滥用[A];当代法学论坛(二○一○年第1辑)[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 蒋志培(作者系最高法院民三庭庭长);用司法救济手段 加强专利权保护[N];人民法院报;2000年
2 本报记者 魏小毛;与时俱进 日臻完善[N];中国知识产权报;2008年
3 田浩;“天下第一刀”专利权复归专利权人[N];中国教育报;2005年
4 记者 乔地;我专利权人状告日本索尼、佳能公司[N];科技日报;2010年
5 本报记者 胡Z
本文编号:2165331
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2165331.html