司法过程中法律解释的利益衡量问题

发布时间：2018-11-06 08:51

【摘要】：研究司法过程中的法律解释,是对最原始意义上法律解释现象的研究,它强调的是法官作为解释者在审理具体案件中解释法律的活动。所谓利益衡量,也称法益衡量,是指在法律所保护的利益之间发生相互冲突时,由法官根据立法者在面对此种情况下可能采取的措施,对冲突的利益确定其轻重而进行的权衡与取舍活动。本文围绕司法过程中法律解释的立场、方法以及结论三个方面,采用利益衡量的方法考察法官作为法律解释者的思维方式,从而厘清法官在造法过程中的权限问题,探究运用各种法律解释方法的利益协调问题,以及论证法律解释结论的妥当性问题等,将有助于维护法律的权威性并提高司法的信任度。第一章内容是法律解释两种立场之间的利益衡平问题。法律解释在司法过程中存在司法能动与司法克制两种解释立场,通过阐明两种立场之间利益冲突,并深入分析立场冲突的原因,试图回答法律解释应当如何实现能动与克制之间的利益衡平问题。第二章内容是法律解释方法的利益衡量问题。这章主要包括三个问题：解释方法排序的合理性质疑问题、解释方法多样化选择的利益衡平问题、利益衡量本身作为解释方法的问题,其中重点指出了利益衡量作为法律解释方法应当如何在司法实践中进行应用。第三章内容是法律解释结论的利益考量问题,通过指出法律解释结论的先决性和有效性问题,最后以一起典型的案例进行实证分析,旨在强调法官依照利益衡量作出司法判决结果时必备的谨慎态度。本文通过探究司法过程中上述法律解释问题,希望能够科学、全面的理解法律解释活动,并希望能够促使我们不断地发现新问题、新思路。
[Abstract]:The study of the legal interpretation in the judicial process is a study of the phenomenon of the legal interpretation in the most primitive sense, which emphasizes the activities of the judge as the interpreter in interpreting the law in the hearing of specific cases. The so-called balance of interests, also known as the weighing of legal interests, refers to measures that may be taken by a legislator in the face of such a situation when there is a conflict between the interests protected by the law. The tradeoff and trade-off between the interests of a conflict and its weight. This paper focuses on the position, method and conclusion of the legal interpretation in the judicial process, and uses the method of interest measurement to investigate the way of thinking of the judge as the interpreter of the law, so as to clarify the jurisdiction of the judge in the process of making law. It will be helpful to maintain the authority of the law and to improve the trust of the judicature by probing into the problem of interest coordination of various legal interpretation methods and proving the appropriateness of the conclusion of legal interpretation. The first chapter is about the balance of interests between the two positions of legal interpretation. There are two kinds of interpretation positions in the judicial process of legal interpretation: judicial initiative and judicial restraint. By clarifying the conflict of interest between the two positions, the causes of conflict of position are analyzed in depth. This paper tries to answer the question of how to balance the interests between initiative and restraint in legal interpretation. The second chapter is about the interest measurement of legal interpretation method. This chapter mainly includes three problems: the question of the reasonableness of the sequencing of interpretation methods, the problem of equalizing the interests of the diversified selection of interpretation methods, and the problem of interest measurement itself as an interpretation method. The emphasis is on how to use interest measurement as a method of legal interpretation in judicial practice. The third chapter is about the benefit consideration of the conclusion of legal interpretation, by pointing out the pre-determination and validity of the conclusion of legal interpretation, and finally using a typical case for empirical analysis. The aim is to emphasize the caution that judges must take when making judicial decisions according to their interests. By exploring the above-mentioned legal interpretation problems in the judicial process, this paper hopes to understand the legal interpretation activities scientifically and comprehensively, and hopes to promote us to find new problems and new ideas.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】