论日本政府架空、废弃和平宪法的法理缺陷

发布时间：2018-11-15 18:08

【摘要】：第二次世界大战结束时,作为战胜国对日本国主权限制的结果,《日本国宪法》第9条明确规定不保持陆海空军及其他战争力量,不承认国家的交战权。"旧金山和约"签订后,宪法第9条被日本政府解释成为其宗旨并不否定独立国家固有的自卫权。然而这样的解释既偏离了宪法第9条的宗旨,也不能满足日本右翼势力的军事强国的愿望。此后,日本右翼势力曾先后掀起过数次改宪浪潮,意欲废弃宪法第9条。2014年日本内阁会议决定修改宪法解释以解禁集体自卫权。本文以《日本国宪法》和国际法为视角,就日本政府和修宪阵营歪曲和平宪法的理论进行梳理和分析、并就限制日本主权的期限和修改、废弃和平宪法的条件等问题进行了论证,阐述了修改日本和平宪法不属于日本国排他性的主权事项。
[Abstract]:At the end of the second World War, as a result of the victorious nations' restrictions on Japan's sovereignty, Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan expressly stipulates that the land, navy, air force and other war forces shall not be maintained and that the state's right of engagement shall not be recognized. " After the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Article 9 of the Constitution was interpreted by the Japanese government as its purpose and did not deny the inherent right of self-defence of an independent state. Such an interpretation, however, deviates from the tenet of Article 9 of the Constitution and does not satisfy the wishes of Japan's rightwing military powers. Since then, Japan's right-wing forces have set off several waves of constitutional change in an attempt to scrap Article 9 of the Constitution. A 2014 cabinet meeting decided to amend the constitutional interpretation to lift the right to collective self-defence. From the perspective of the Japanese Constitution and international law, this paper combs and analyzes the theories of the Japanese government and the constitutional amendment camp that distort the peaceful constitution, and discusses the time limit and modification of Japan's sovereignty. This paper discusses the conditions for abandoning the peace constitution, and expounds the sovereign right to amend the Japanese peace constitution which is not exclusive to Japan.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;华东政法大学东方毅军事法研究中心;
【分类号】：D931.3;DD911

【参考文献】