法律转型期司法引导社会变革的限度——以民国初年大理院判解中的人格平等为重心
发布时间：2019-01-07 08:40
【摘要】：在民国初年法律转型期,大理院在展现司法引导社会变革之可能的同时,也展现了司法引导社会变革的刚性条件。民国初年大理院在司法兼营立法的实践中,其所引导的从尊卑贵贱到人格平等的变革,不仅受制于民初的经济政治文化条件,受制于法源位阶的刚性约束,也受社会共识、司法权威以及司法实效等动力因素的制约。当下中国全面推进依法治国的实践,旨在变革传统中的反法治基因,其难度并不亚于民初对尊卑贵贱传统的变革。针对司法引导社会变革的这一当代语境,回顾民国初年大理院的实践不无借鉴参考意义。
[Abstract]:In the legal transition period of the early Republic of China, Dali College not only showed the possibility of judicial guidance social change, but also showed the rigid conditions of judicial guidance social change. In the practice of concurrently managing judicial legislation in the early years of the Republic of China, Dali Institute guided the transformation from superiority and inferiority to the equality of personality, which was not only restricted by the economic, political and cultural conditions in the early Republic of China, but also by the rigid constraints of the legal source rank, as well as by social consensus. Judicial authority and judicial effectiveness and other dynamic factors constraints. At present, the practice of comprehensively promoting the rule of law in China aims at reforming the anti-rule of law gene in the tradition, which is no less difficult than the transformation of the tradition of superiority and inferiority at the beginning of the Republic of China. In view of the contemporary context of judicial leading social change, it is of reference significance to review the practice of Dali Institute in the early Republic of China.
【作者单位】： 河南工业大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年国家社科基金重点项目(11AZD044) 2015年河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目(2015SBS016)
【分类号】：D929
本文编号：2403461
[Abstract]:In the legal transition period of the early Republic of China, Dali College not only showed the possibility of judicial guidance social change, but also showed the rigid conditions of judicial guidance social change. In the practice of concurrently managing judicial legislation in the early years of the Republic of China, Dali Institute guided the transformation from superiority and inferiority to the equality of personality, which was not only restricted by the economic, political and cultural conditions in the early Republic of China, but also by the rigid constraints of the legal source rank, as well as by social consensus. Judicial authority and judicial effectiveness and other dynamic factors constraints. At present, the practice of comprehensively promoting the rule of law in China aims at reforming the anti-rule of law gene in the tradition, which is no less difficult than the transformation of the tradition of superiority and inferiority at the beginning of the Republic of China. In view of the contemporary context of judicial leading social change, it is of reference significance to review the practice of Dali Institute in the early Republic of China.
【作者单位】： 河南工业大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年国家社科基金重点项目(11AZD044) 2015年河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目(2015SBS016)
【分类号】：D929
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 刘东升;;法律的人文属性论略[J];理论界;2007年05期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 尹卫国;请珍爱自己的膝盖[N];中国社会报;2011年
，本文编号：2403461
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2403461.html
