《大清新刑律》罪刑法定原则研究
[Abstract]:The promulgation of the Great fresh Criminal Law is the beginning of modern Chinese criminal law. The principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime is stipulated, which also highlights its advanced nature. The introduction of the principle of legality of crime is a historic turning point in the history of the development of criminal law in China. It plays an important role in the development of Chinese criminal law, so it is of great significance to study the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime in the Great fresh Criminal Law. To China, the principle of legality is an import. It is a legal principle completely introduced from the West, which did not exist in our country before. Therefore, this paper firstly studies the origin of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, introduces its origin, meaning, ideological basis, and its development and evolution process. And further discussed the difference between the doctrine of legality and the principle of legality. In ancient China, the monarch was the supreme authority, and he had all kinds of rights. It is impossible to raise the legality doctrine of restricting power into a kind of legal principle. In the ancient society of our country, there is only the ideological level of the legality of the crime and there is not the principle of the legality of the crime. The principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime was introduced into China under this background. Firstly, the social and economic structure was changed by the invasion of western powers in the late Qing Dynasty, and the western powers brought in the western legal ideas while plundering the economy. Secondly, the Qing government carried out some legal reforms in order to protect itself, and some jurists with advanced ideas also played a certain role in promoting the introduction of the principle of legality. The core content of this paper is the problems existing in the legislative embodiment and introduction of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. This paper mainly analyzes the legal provisions of the new criminal law which embody the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime from seven aspects, and discusses the meaning of these provisions and how to embody the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. The principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime is established on the basis of drawing lessons from western law, so there are many problems in the establishment of the new criminal law. The introduction of the principal principle of legality has a profound influence. First of all, from the ideological level, it advocated the equality, freedom, human rights and other advanced ideas on the ancient Chinese society, the traditional monarchy, the thought of rule of man has a great impact. Secondly, from the system level, the Criminal Law of Great freshness clearly stipulates the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime in the general principles and removes "adjunct invocation", which is a powerful blow to the deep-rooted "adjunct invocation" rule in feudal society. Finally, it is the influence of the introduction of the principle of legality on the criminal legislation of the Republic of China. During the period of the Beiyang Government and the National Government, the criminal legislation of the Great freshening Criminal Law was followed in accordance with the provisions of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime in the period of the Beiyang Government and the National Government. It embodies the function of this principle in criminal law. This shows that the introduction of the principle of legality in the new criminal law has a profound impact on the criminal law of later generations and is of great significance, and fully reflects its advanced nature. The establishment of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime in the Great New Criminal Law is the most important step in the history of the development of Chinese criminal law. Its introduction opened the prologue of the modernization of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D924;D929
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜波;论罪刑法定原则与刑法的机能[J];铁道警官高等专科学校学报;2004年03期
2 杨玉玲;;按罪刑法定原则要求 完善我国的刑事立法与司法[J];重庆行政;2004年06期
3 王巧全;;罪刑法定、法律解释与机械执法[J];江苏警官学院学报;2006年01期
4 彭斌;俞泽迪;;罪刑法定原则思想理论基础之人权解读——以权利为视角[J];法制与社会;2006年20期
5 周辉;;略论罪刑法定原则[J];探索者学刊;2001年01期
6 何苏民;在刑法中明确规定罪刑法定原则是我国刑事立法的一大进步[J];行政与法;1997年03期
7 周光权;罪刑法定原则的司法运用[J];江海学刊;1999年06期
8 阮方民;从旧兼从轻:刑法适用的“准据法原则”——兼论罪刑法定原则蕴含的程序法意义[J];法学研究;1999年06期
9 郑丽萍;论罪刑法定原则在我国刑法中的确立及体现[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);1999年02期
10 姚晓茹;论罪刑法定原则[J];辽宁师专学报(社会科学版);1999年02期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 刘鹏;;论罪刑法定原则在我国刑法中的实现[A];首届贵州法学论坛文集[C];2000年
2 毛元学;;无罪羁押者能否成为脱逃罪主体探析[A];当代法学论坛(二○○九年第2辑)[C];2009年
3 程雨燕;;环境行政处罚法定原则的风险预防考量[A];生态安全与环境风险防范法治建设——2011年全国环境资源法学研讨会(年会)论文集(第二册)[C];2011年
4 孙光骏;;关于刑事和解的几个法律问题[A];第二届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 杨学昊;浅析罪刑法定原则的基本内容及在我国司法实践中存在的问题[N];天津政法报;2009年
2 广西田林县公安局 黄耀真;如何把握罪刑法定原则与法律解释[N];江苏法制报;2010年
3 常州市戚墅堰区检察院 李方方;罪刑法定原则 面临的困境[N];江苏法制报;2011年
4 ;罪刑法定原则及其司法化[N];检察日报;2001年
5 钱云华;非法为他人贴现票据能否定罪[N];检察日报;2004年
6 周迅;论罪刑法定原则实施之保障[N];人民法院报;2000年
7 高 尚;潮流与传统间的徘徊[N];人民法院报;2004年
8 辛言;附条件不起诉是法治之忧[N];延安日报;2009年
9 肖中华;走出贯彻罪刑法定的误区[N];法制日报;2004年
10 邾茂林;司法权的强化与限制应辩证统一[N];检察日报;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前7条
1 李靓;近代三大基本刑法原则对《大清新刑律》的影响[D];中国政法大学;2002年
2 孟红;罪刑法定原则与近代中国刑法之变迁[D];华东政法学院;2007年
3 李金明;不真正不作为犯研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
4 袁彬;刑法的心理学分析[D];中国政法大学;2006年
5 音正权;刑法变迁中的法律家(1902--1935)[D];中国政法大学;2001年
6 杨艳霞;正当性刑法解释路径研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
7 尹华蓉;论亲告罪的合理范围[D];华东政法大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 马雷敏;《大清新刑律》罪刑法定原则研究[D];郑州大学;2011年
2 刘毅;我国罪刑法定原则历史演变探究[D];西南政法大学;2010年
3 刘基华;论罪刑法定原则在当代中国的实现[D];华东政法大学;2010年
4 覃雅胤;论罪刑法定原则的司法化[D];南京大学;2011年
5 聂昭伟;罪刑法定原则在新刑法实施后的缺憾与弥补[D];中国政法大学;2002年
6 张原瑞;论罪刑法定原则及其司法化[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2012年
7 张鹏飞;论罪刑法定原则实现的障碍及其突破[D];兰州大学;2010年
8 王恺欢;论罪刑法定原则的司法运用[D];昆明理工大学;2011年
9 石晓华;不可期待的理性[D];西南政法大学;2004年
10 赵晓阳;《大清新刑律》职务犯罪立法研究[D];郑州大学;2011年
,本文编号:2408581
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2408581.html