立法后评估法律制度研究
发布时间：2019-01-26 20:38
【摘要】：近年来,我国的立法主体积极探索提高立法质量的各种方式和途径,立法后评估制度就是其中的成果之一。广义的立法过程论认为立法后评估是立法过程中的重要一环。目前,我国法学界对立法后评估制度的研究尚处于起步阶段,实践探索和理论研究的空白使得法学界,尤其是立法学界,对此制度的价值未达成一致看法。 本文在综合考察国内外尤其是我国地方各级人民政府开展立法后评估实践情况的基础上,重点研究立法后评估制度在我国的科学构建。绪论介绍目前各地开展立法后评估工作的一些情况,并对研究立法后评估制度的重要性作了阐述,明确了全文将要探讨的问题的主旨和思路以及研究方法。除前言外,正文共分为四部分,具体结构如下：第一章阐述了立法后评估制度的概念。开篇总结了目前学界对立法后评估概念的不同理解,对立法后评估制度进行了界定。同时通过与执法检查、法律绩效评估等相似概念的比较阐述了立法后评估制度的特征。在本章末揭示了建立立法后评估制度的理论依据。第二章通过考察立法后评估制度在我国的演进。介绍我国开展立法后评估的实践情况,综述我国立法后评估尚处于起步阶段的现状,归纳我国目前立法后评估制度的不足之处,强调目前我国的立法后评估活动亟需制度化的规范和指引,为后续论述立法后评估制度的构建提供实证基础。第三章全面、创新地构建了我国科学、合理的立法后评估制度,包括评估主体、评估对象、评估标准、评估程序,推动我国立法后评估制度的法制化。本章首先借鉴国外做法,推动立法后评估制度的法制化,接着从建立统一的评估标准、多元的评估主体、合理确定评估对象以及完善评估程序等四个方面对我国的立法后评估制度进行构建和完善。第四章在宪政视野下论述了我国建立立法后评估制度的可行性和必要性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the main body of legislation in our country has actively explored various ways and means to improve the quality of legislation, among which the post-legislative evaluation system is one of the achievements. The broad legislative process theory thinks that the post-legislative evaluation is an important part of the legislative process. At present, the research on the post-legislative evaluation system is still in its infancy in the field of law in our country, and the gap of practical exploration and theoretical research makes the legal circles, especially the legislative circle, not agree on the value of this system. Based on the comprehensive investigation of the practice of post-legislative evaluation at home and abroad, especially by the local people's governments at all levels, this paper focuses on the scientific construction of the post-legislative evaluation system in China. The introduction introduces some situations of the post-legislative evaluation in various places at present, expounds the importance of studying the post-legislative evaluation system, and clarifies the purport, train of thought and research methods of the issues to be discussed in the full text. In addition to the preface, the text is divided into four parts, the specific structure is as follows: the first chapter describes the concept of post-legislative evaluation system. In the beginning, the author summarizes the different understanding of the concept of post-legislative assessment and defines the system of post-legislative evaluation. At the same time, the characteristics of the post-legislative evaluation system are discussed by comparing with the similar concepts such as law enforcement inspection, legal performance evaluation and so on. At the end of this chapter, it reveals the theoretical basis of establishing the post-legislative evaluation system. The second chapter examines the evolution of the post-legislative evaluation system in China. This paper introduces the practice of post-legislative evaluation in China, summarizes the current situation that the post-legislative evaluation is still in its infancy, and summarizes the shortcomings of the current post-legislative evaluation system in China. It is emphasized that it is urgent to institutionalize the post-legislative evaluation activities in China to provide an empirical basis for the subsequent discussion on the construction of the post-legislative evaluation system. The third chapter comprehensively and innovatively constructs the scientific and reasonable post-legislative evaluation system of our country, including the evaluation subject, the object, the evaluation standard, the evaluation procedure, and promotes the legalization of the post-legislation evaluation system in our country. This chapter first draws lessons from foreign practices to promote the legalization of the post-legislative evaluation system, and then from the establishment of a unified evaluation criteria, multiple evaluation of the main body, This paper constructs and perfects the system of post-legislative evaluation in four aspects: reasonable determination of evaluation object and perfection of evaluation procedure. The fourth chapter discusses the feasibility and necessity of establishing the post-legislative evaluation system in the field of constitutionalism.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D920.0
本文编号：2415889
[Abstract]:In recent years, the main body of legislation in our country has actively explored various ways and means to improve the quality of legislation, among which the post-legislative evaluation system is one of the achievements. The broad legislative process theory thinks that the post-legislative evaluation is an important part of the legislative process. At present, the research on the post-legislative evaluation system is still in its infancy in the field of law in our country, and the gap of practical exploration and theoretical research makes the legal circles, especially the legislative circle, not agree on the value of this system. Based on the comprehensive investigation of the practice of post-legislative evaluation at home and abroad, especially by the local people's governments at all levels, this paper focuses on the scientific construction of the post-legislative evaluation system in China. The introduction introduces some situations of the post-legislative evaluation in various places at present, expounds the importance of studying the post-legislative evaluation system, and clarifies the purport, train of thought and research methods of the issues to be discussed in the full text. In addition to the preface, the text is divided into four parts, the specific structure is as follows: the first chapter describes the concept of post-legislative evaluation system. In the beginning, the author summarizes the different understanding of the concept of post-legislative assessment and defines the system of post-legislative evaluation. At the same time, the characteristics of the post-legislative evaluation system are discussed by comparing with the similar concepts such as law enforcement inspection, legal performance evaluation and so on. At the end of this chapter, it reveals the theoretical basis of establishing the post-legislative evaluation system. The second chapter examines the evolution of the post-legislative evaluation system in China. This paper introduces the practice of post-legislative evaluation in China, summarizes the current situation that the post-legislative evaluation is still in its infancy, and summarizes the shortcomings of the current post-legislative evaluation system in China. It is emphasized that it is urgent to institutionalize the post-legislative evaluation activities in China to provide an empirical basis for the subsequent discussion on the construction of the post-legislative evaluation system. The third chapter comprehensively and innovatively constructs the scientific and reasonable post-legislative evaluation system of our country, including the evaluation subject, the object, the evaluation standard, the evaluation procedure, and promotes the legalization of the post-legislation evaluation system in our country. This chapter first draws lessons from foreign practices to promote the legalization of the post-legislative evaluation system, and then from the establishment of a unified evaluation criteria, multiple evaluation of the main body, This paper constructs and perfects the system of post-legislative evaluation in four aspects: reasonable determination of evaluation object and perfection of evaluation procedure. The fourth chapter discusses the feasibility and necessity of establishing the post-legislative evaluation system in the field of constitutionalism.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨建顺;;论行政评价机制与参与型行政[J];北方法学;2007年01期
2 汪全胜;;立法后评估概念阐释[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
3 王俊;;后立法时代的伦理和谐[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年06期
4 汪全胜;;美国行政立法的成本与效益评估探讨[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年06期
5 胡峻;;行政立法后评估与行政立法责任的归结[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2009年03期
6 俞荣根;刘艺;;地方性法规质量评估的理论意义与实践难题[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
7 席涛;美国政府管制成本与收益的实证分析[J];经济理论与经济管理;2002年11期
8 王春福;试论政策评估和政策评价的区别[J];理论探讨;1992年03期
9 江必新;;行政法学研究应如何回应服务型政府的实践[J];现代法学;2009年01期
10 于立深;美国《管制计划与审查》行政命令[J];行政法学研究;2003年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李鸿飞;立法后评估制度研究[D];中国海洋大学;2008年
，本文编号：2415889
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2415889.html
