我国家长主义法律研究
发布时间：2019-03-24 20:02
【摘要】：任何一个关心人民幸福与利益的国家都存在着这样一类政策.:这类政策要求公民个人从事或者避免从事某些仅影响公民自身的活动。这类政策背后的法律原则被统称为“家长主义”。家长主义行为是为了其调整对象的福祉考虑,也就是“为了他好”。在国内外的研究家长主义的文献中,普遍集中在对家长主义的定义、家长主义干涉的手段和方法、家长主义的正当性、家长主义的干预情形等做了深入而广泛的探讨,而鲜有学者对于家长主义在我国法律中的立法表现、我国家长主义法律的理论特点、我国家长主义式法律的实施情况及实施中遇到的问题、我国家长主义式法律的优缺点等问题做进一步的研究,使得法律家长主义理论无法与我国立法、司法实践深入融合,我国家长主义式的立法方向该往哪个方向发展更无从谈起。因此,本文将家长主义原则做为解读法律的一种视角,旨在从我国的法律中分析出家长主义目的,对我国家长主义式法律法规进行深入的分析和讨论,判断目前我国存在的家长式法律是否具备合法性与正当性,探讨家长式法律存在的理论疑难和实施过程中遇到的实际问题,旨在为我国法律家长主义研究做出贡献。
[Abstract]:Any country that cares about the well-being and interests of its people has policies that require individual citizens to engage in or refrain from engaging in certain activities that affect themselves. The legal principles behind such policies are collectively called paternalism. Patriarchal behavior is for the well-being of the person it adjusts, that is, "for his own good." In the literature on paternalism at home and abroad, it is generally focused on the definition of paternalism, the means and methods of paternalism interference, the legitimacy of paternalism, and the situation of paternalism intervention, etc. But few scholars about the legislative performance of paternalism in Chinese law, the theoretical characteristics of paternalistic law in China, the implementation of paternalistic law in China and the problems encountered in the implementation of the law, Further research on the merits and demerits of paternalistic law in our country makes it impossible to integrate the theory of paternalism with our legislation and judicial practice, and it is even more impossible to talk about which direction of paternalistic legislation should be developed in our country. Therefore, this article takes the patriarchal principle as a kind of angle of view to interpret the law, aiming at analyzing the patriarchal purpose from the law of our country, and carrying on the in-depth analysis and discussion to the paternalistic laws and regulations of our country, To judge whether the paternalistic law exists in our country has legitimacy and legitimacy, to probe into the theoretical difficulties and practical problems encountered in the implementation of paternalistic law, in order to contribute to the study of legal paternalism in our country.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.0
本文编号：2446630
[Abstract]:Any country that cares about the well-being and interests of its people has policies that require individual citizens to engage in or refrain from engaging in certain activities that affect themselves. The legal principles behind such policies are collectively called paternalism. Patriarchal behavior is for the well-being of the person it adjusts, that is, "for his own good." In the literature on paternalism at home and abroad, it is generally focused on the definition of paternalism, the means and methods of paternalism interference, the legitimacy of paternalism, and the situation of paternalism intervention, etc. But few scholars about the legislative performance of paternalism in Chinese law, the theoretical characteristics of paternalistic law in China, the implementation of paternalistic law in China and the problems encountered in the implementation of the law, Further research on the merits and demerits of paternalistic law in our country makes it impossible to integrate the theory of paternalism with our legislation and judicial practice, and it is even more impossible to talk about which direction of paternalistic legislation should be developed in our country. Therefore, this article takes the patriarchal principle as a kind of angle of view to interpret the law, aiming at analyzing the patriarchal purpose from the law of our country, and carrying on the in-depth analysis and discussion to the paternalistic laws and regulations of our country, To judge whether the paternalistic law exists in our country has legitimacy and legitimacy, to probe into the theoretical difficulties and practical problems encountered in the implementation of paternalistic law, in order to contribute to the study of legal paternalism in our country.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邹海林;;再论人格权的民法表达[J];比较法研究;2016年04期
2 杨立新;;《民法总则》制定与我国监护制度之完善[J];法学家;2016年01期
3 李岩;;公序良俗原则的司法乱象与本相——兼论公序良俗原则适用的类型化[J];法学;2015年11期
4 唐忠民;陈绍辉;;论精神病人强制医疗程序之完善——以人身自由保障为视角[J];河北法学;2014年10期
5 张翔;;财产权的社会义务[J];中国社会科学;2012年09期
6 方泉;;犯罪化的正当性原则——兼评乔尔·范伯格的限制自由原则[J];法学;2012年08期
7 郭春镇;林海;;“对接”的“父爱”——评《侵权责任法》第56条中的“医疗权”[J];私法;2011年02期
8 王洪亮;;消费者撤回权的正当性基础[J];法学;2010年12期
9 刘宁微;;论禁治产人制度在我国监护制度完善中的作用[J];前沿;2010年13期
10 姜涛;;刑法中的聚众淫乱罪该向何处去[J];法学;2010年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 朱寅昊;公法人道化研究[D];苏州大学;2014年
2 凌萍萍;被害人承诺研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
，本文编号：2446630
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2446630.html
