马克思主义法律思想的中国起源探析

发布时间：2019-06-26 21:21

【摘要】：马克思主义法律思想中国化是马克思主义法律思想在中国传播成功的前提下，伴随着马克思主义法律思想与中国的实践相结合的历史进程而开拓、创新和不断前进的。既然是一个历史过程，，就一定有一个起点，这便是“马克思主义法律思想的中国起源”问题。本文的研究目的正是基于对马克思主义法律思想在中国的传播与马克思主义法律思想中国化的关系的认识，因此，其最终旨趣落在马克思主义法律思想中国化上，审视“马克思主义法律思想的中国起源”在马克思主义法律思想中国化历史进程上的意义，并总结该起源所蕴含的意义与局限性，从而为马克思主义法律思想中国化继续推进提供现代启示。本文分为五个部分：引论部分介绍了本文的问题来源与研究意义、以“五四”时期作为研究对象的原因、以及与本文相关研究的研究现状，并着重指出本文的“外史”与“内史”的研究方法。第一部分，“五四”后期（1919—1921），马克思主义法律思想的中国起源，以“五四”时期李大钊和胡汉民的文章为研究文本，挖掘了马克思主义法律思想中国起源之时，中国早期的马克思主义传播者着重阐释了经济基础决定上层建筑这一历史唯物主义法律思想的理论基础、法的阶级意志观、法的历史发展理论、法与经济的关系以及人的自由发展观等马克思主义法律思想内容。第二部分，一种外史的视角——“五四”前期（1915—1918）的社会与思想，是运用外史的研究方法，分析“马克思主义法律思想的中国起源”与当时的社会历史条件以及时代氛围的关系，从思想家出现和发展的政治经济文化条件揭示出“马克思主义法律思想中国起源”的原因在于唯物史观与革命的关联性。第三部分，一种内史的视角——三大论争的意义，是通过还原当时马克思主义传播者在同各种非马克思主义甚至反马克思主义思想的论争中所呈现出来的特征，揭示他们接受马克思主义法律思想的原因也在于试图通过革命手段解决当时中国的问题。本文的结论：其一，“五四”时期可以视为“马克思主义法律思想的中国起源”，而并非“马克思主义法律思想中国化的开端”，马克思主义法律思想中国化必须具备实践品格；其二，马克思主义法律思想中国化必须完成从“革命”迈向“建设”的转化，适应新时代的要求，立足当下中国法治实践，不断创新和超越，为法治建设提供新的智慧与贡献。
[Abstract]:The sinicization of the Marxist legal thought is the premise that the Marxist legal thought is successful in China, and is developed, innovated and advanced along with the historical process of the combination of the Marxist legal thought and the practice of China. Since it is a historical process, there must be a starting point, which is a question of "The Chinese Origin of the Marxist Legal Thought". The purpose of this paper is based on the understanding of the relationship between the dissemination of the Marxist legal thought in China and the sinicization of the Chinese legal thought, so its final interest is on the sinicization of the Marxist legal thought, This paper examines the significance of the "The Chinese Origin of the Marxist Legal Thought" in the process of the sinicization of the Chinese legal thought, and summarizes the meaning and limitation of the origin, so as to provide the modern enlightenment for the sinicization of the Chinese legal thought. This paper is divided into five parts In this paper, the paper introduces the origin and significance of the paper, the reason of the May 4th period as the research object, and the research status of the research in this paper, and highlights the research of the external history and the internal history. The first part, the later period of the May 4th Movement (1919-1921), the Chinese origin of the Marxist legal thought, the articles of Li Dawu and Hu Hanmin during the May 4th Movement, as the research text, excavated the Marxist legal thought At the time of the country's origin, the early Marxist propagators in China emphasized the theoretical basis of the historical materialism legal thought of the economic base and the superstructure, the class will view and the law of the law. The Relationship between the Theory of the History Development, the Relationship between the Law and the Economy, and the Marxist Law of the People's Free Development View The second part, the view of the external history, the social and thought of the early stage of the "May 4th Movement" (1915-1918), is the method of using the external history to analyze the social and historical conditions of the "The Chinese Origin of the Marxist Legal Thought" and the time. The relationship between the atmosphere of the times and the political and economic cultural conditions of the emergence and development of the thinkers reveal the reason of the "The Origin of China's Legal Thought in China" lies in the historical materialism The relevance of the revolution, the third part, the view of an internal history, the significance of the three debates, is through the reduction of the time that the Marxist propagator is in the debate with various non-Marxist and even anti-Marxist ideas The features presented and the reason for revealing their acceptance of the Marxist legal thought are also in an attempt to pass the revolutionary means To solve the problem in China at that time, the conclusion of this paper: First, the "May 4th Movement" period can be regarded as a "The Chinese Origin of the Marxist Legal Thought", not a "The Beginning of the Sinicization of the Marxist Legal Thought", and the sinicization of the Marxist legal thought must have the practical character; and secondly, the sinicization of the Marxist legal thought must be completed from the "the revolution" to the "trunk>" construction. "n" transformation of ", adapting to the requirements of the new era, based on the practice of the rule of law in China, continuous innovation and transcendence, and providing the rule of law
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D909.1

【参考文献】