当代中国法院立法审查之现状与未来走向

发布时间：2018-03-21 01:40

本文选题：法院　切入点：立法　出处：《政治与法律》2013年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在我国现行宪政体制下,对立法的监督权主要由立法机关来行使,法院并不拥有对立法的撤销、改变权。囿于我国行政诉讼法之规定,学界通常认为我国法院并不拥有对立法行为的司法审查权。然而,从理论上说,法律的选择适用本身即蕴含着审查权;从立法上看,我国宪法、法律非但没有明确否定法院对立法行为的审查权,反而对之作了有限的明确和肯定;从司法实务的角度看,法院或者通过个案判决,或者通过司法解释的方式行使着对立法行为的审查权——尽管这种审查有时显得那么低调和克制,但不改审查之实质。法院享有司法审查权,是由司法权的性质和现代国家权力结构所决定的。法院的立法审查权应该是一种附带性的、基于个案需要的审查权,而不能脱离个案需要去进行一般性的审查,那不是法院的职责,否则,法治将有可能演变为"法院之治"。
[Abstract]:In our current constitutional system, the supervision legislation mainly by the legislature to exercise, the court does not have legislation on the right. Due to revocation, change the administrative procedure law, scholars generally believe that China's courts do not have the right to judicial review of legislative action. However, in theory and the choice of law applicable itself contains the right to review; from the point of legislation, the constitution of our country, the law did not explicitly deny the court of legislative acts of the right to review, but to make limited clear and definite; from the angle of judicial practice, the court or through case judgment, or by way of judicial interpretation exercise of legislative review of behavior right -- although this review sometimes seemed so low-key and restrained, but does not change the substantive review. The court has the power of judicial review, is determined by the nature of judicial power and the modern state power structure The legislative review power of the court should be a supplementary one, which is based on the right of case review, rather than a general review from the needs of a case. That's not the responsibility of the court. Otherwise, the rule of law will probably evolve into "rule of the court".

【作者单位】：江西财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】