以危险方法危害公共安全罪司法适用疑难问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-28 00:00

本文选题：危险方法　切入点：其他危险方法　出处：《上海交通大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来，，我国刑法理论界对以危险方法危害公共安全罪司法适用中的扩大化倾向进行了广泛批评，认为很多判决违背了罪刑法定原则，因而主张严格限制本罪的适用范围。从立法沿革以及立法背景上看，本罪的产生具有必然性，对于保护社会公共安全具有重要作用，因而过度限制本罪的适用并不科学。本罪在司法适用中存在“同案不同判”现象，其原因主要在于立法上存在缺陷，法条对犯罪构成要件中的“公共安全”、“其他危险方法”等关键概念的定义不清晰。对犯罪客体“公共安全”的理解，应坚持“不特定的多数人”，即要同时具备不特定和多数人两方面要求；对犯罪客观方面“其他危险方法”的理解，应坚持“任何足以危害公共安全的违法行为”，以实现对公共安全法益的全面保护，同时应具备行为的违法性、危险的具体性、危险的重大性、行为的一次性等特征。在这一解释体系下，本罪司法适用中的“同案不同判”问题得到了有效解决。
[Abstract]:In recent years, our country criminal law theory was widely criticized for the crime of endangering public safety, the judicial application of the tendency of expansion, think a lot of judgment violates the principle of legality, so that the application of strictly limit the scope of the crime. From the legislative history and legislative background point of view, the production is inevitable, with an important role for the protection of public safety, and excessive restrictions on the application of science does not exist. "Somesentence" phenomenon of this crime in judicial practice, the main reason lies in the defects of legislation, the law on the crime of "public safety", definition of "other dangerous methods" and other key concepts are not clear. The object of the crime of "public security", should adhere to the "majority" is not specific, that is to have two specific and most people on the objective aspects of crime; "Other dangerous methods", should adhere to the "no harm to public safety violations, in order to realize the comprehensive protection of public security interests, and should have the illegal behavior, specific risk, major risk, characteristics of one-time behavior. In this interpretation system. The judicial application of the" somesentence "problem has been effectively solved.

【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924;D926

【参考文献】