论民事诉调对接机制

发布时间：2018-03-30 00:16

本文选题：诉调对接　切入点：人民调解　出处：《宁波大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：诉调对接机制产生发展于司法实践中，“诉”顾名思义是指诉讼，“调”是指调解，诉调对接从广义上讲是指诉讼与调解的衔接，从狭义上讲，诉调对接是民事诉讼调解与人民调解的对接，诉调对接机制的意义在于缓解法院的诉讼压力、推进多元化解纷机制的创建以及促进和谐社会的建设，各地法院在没有基本法予以规定的情况下，根据当地的实际情况进行摸索，探索出诉前调解、委托调解、协助调解等各具特色的调解模式，并在探索过程中不断发现问题，不断解决问题。本文第一部分阐述了民事诉调对接机制的发展背景，缓解法院的诉讼压力、推进多元化解纷机制的创建以及促进和谐社会的建设。本文第二部分阐述了民事诉调对接机制的实践，，即民事诉调对接的程序对接机制：诉前调解、委托人民调解和协助调解，以及民事诉调对接的效力对接机制—司法确认。本文第三部分阐述了民事诉调对接机制实践中的现存问题，包括程序对接机制的不足和效力对接机制的不足，程序对接机制的不足主要体现在立法缺失、诉调衔接不顺畅、诉前调解缺乏程序规则等；效力对接机制的不足主要体现在司法确认程序的性质模糊、司法确认范围不明确、司法确认缺乏统一标准等；此外，民事诉调对接机制保障机制不健全，缺乏长效机制。本文第四部分阐述了民事诉调对接机制的完善，包括程序对接机制的完善，效力对接机制的完善和保障机制的完善。程序对接机制的完善包括加快立法步伐、促使诉调对接规范化，建立有效的诉调衔接制度，建立有效的诉前调解程序约束机制等；效力对接机制的完善包括明确司法确认程序的法律性质，明确司法确认案件范围，统一司法确认审查标准等；另外完善民事诉调对接机制必须健全民事诉调对接的保障机制。
[Abstract]:The mechanism of the docking of litigation and regulation develops from judicial practice. As the name implies, "litigation" means litigation, "mediation" refers to mediation. In a broad sense, it refers to the connection between litigation and mediation, and in a narrow sense, it refers to the connection between litigation and mediation. The docking of litigation and regulation is the connection between civil litigation mediation and people's mediation. The significance of the docking mechanism is to relieve the pressure of the court, to promote the establishment of diversified dispute resolution mechanism and to promote the construction of a harmonious society. Without the provisions of the basic Law, the courts in various localities, in accordance with the actual situation in the locality, have groped, explored and explored different modes of mediation, such as pre-litigation mediation, entrusting mediation, and assisting mediation, and continued to discover problems in the course of exploration. Solve problems constantly. The first part of this article expounds the development background of the civil litigation and adjustment mechanism, alleviates the court litigation pressure, promotes the establishment of the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism and promotes the construction of a harmonious society. The second part of this paper expounds the practice of the docking mechanism of civil litigation, that is, the procedure docking mechanism of civil litigation docking: pre-litigation mediation, entrusting people mediation and assisting mediation, as well as the effectiveness docking mechanism of civil litigation docking-judicial confirmation. The third part of this paper expounds the existing problems in the practice of the civil litigation docking mechanism, including the deficiency of the procedure docking mechanism and the effectiveness docking mechanism. The deficiency of the procedure docking mechanism is mainly reflected in the lack of legislation and the unsmooth connection between the litigation and the regulation. The lack of procedural rules and so on; the deficiency of the mechanism of docking effect is mainly reflected in the ambiguity of the nature of judicial confirmation procedure, the unclear scope of judicial confirmation, the lack of unified standards of judicial confirmation, etc. The mechanism of civil litigation and adjustment is not perfect and lacks of long-term effect. The fourth part of this paper expounds the perfection of the civil litigation docking mechanism, including the procedure docking mechanism, the effectiveness docking mechanism and the protection mechanism. Promote the standardization of the docking of litigation, establish an effective system of connection between litigation and regulation, establish an effective pre-litigation mediation procedure binding mechanism, etc. The perfection of the docking mechanism includes clarifying the legal nature of the judicial confirmation procedure, clarifying the scope of the judicial confirmation case, and so on. In addition, to perfect the docking mechanism of civil litigation, we must perfect the safeguard mechanism of civil litigation docking.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.1;D926

【引证文献】