未成年人监禁刑行刑模式探究

发布时间：2018-03-30 16:37

本文选题：未成年人　切入点：刑罚执行　出处：《苏州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：未成年人监禁刑行刑模式是指在一定行刑理念的影响下,行刑机关(主要是未成年犯管教所)在刑罚执行中形成的指导思想、方针政策、行刑原则以及一系列行刑方法和手段的总和。有学者定义为是对未成年犯人身监禁及其教育、劳动改造和刑罚的程序与制度的实践程式。由于未成年人的特殊性,我国《刑事诉讼法》第二百一十三条第三款规定,“对未成年犯应当在未成年犯管教所执行刑罚”;《未成年犯管教所管理规定》第二条第二款明确规定,“由人民法院依法判处有期徒刑、无期徒刑未满十八周岁的罪犯应当在未成年犯管教所执行刑罚、接受教育改造。”既然法律亦已规定未成年人监禁刑要区别于成年犯单独执行,其行刑模式理应不同于成年犯。但现实中,我国未成年人监禁刑的行刑如同未成年人刑罚一样高度成人化,现有行刑模式仅是一种与成年犯区分不同行刑场所的“相对分离”模式。该种模式既与未成年人特性不相符合,又与未成年人监禁刑行刑趋势和少年司法制度发展不相适应,无法满足未成年人监禁刑行刑的理性和现实需要,行刑方法不多、行刑制度僵化、行刑效果欠佳等矛盾急需改善。为此,本文试图在廓清未成年人监禁刑行刑理论基础之上,总结和借鉴国内外正当理念和先进经验,结合行刑实践,探究构建一个更加符合刑罚目的与宗旨,更能体现行刑效果的“相对独立”的行刑模式。第一部分对未成年人监禁刑行刑模式作了基本概述,简要介绍了我国未成年人监禁刑行刑的发展历程,分析比较了未成年人与成年人监禁刑的行刑现状。第二部分对现有行刑模式从事物内容和形式两个哲学层面解析了该模式的内涵与主要构成。通过两个层面的阐述,体现出现有模式本身蕴含着内容与形式不相适应的矛盾,进一步分析了现有模式存在的主要弊端及成因。第三部分对国外主要国家未成年人监禁刑的行刑概况进行了考察、评析,并结合我国情况,比较得出可资借鉴的启示和经验。第四部分对未成年人监禁刑行刑的理论基础进行了探寻,在此基础上,结合第三部分内容综合考察了未成年人监禁刑行刑的主要趋势。第五部分是本文的主体,在前四部分研究的基础上,探讨未成年人监禁刑行刑模式的具体完善。该部分没有按照前文分析现有模式之不足与弊端的顺序逐条提出完善对策,而是糅合对策于一体,形成了一个较为整合系统的完善方案,前文的每一点不足与每一项弊端都在整体方案中得到了回应。
[Abstract]:The mode of execution of juvenile imprisonment refers to the guiding ideology, principles and policies formed in the execution of punishment by the execution organs (mainly juvenile correctional institutions) under the influence of certain execution concepts. The principle of execution and the summation of a series of methods and means of execution. Some scholars have defined it as a practical program of the procedure and system of physical imprisonment, education, reform through labour and punishment for juvenile offenders. Article 213, paragraph 3, of China's Criminal procedure Law stipulates that "juvenile offenders shall be punished in correctional institutions for juvenile offenders"; Article 2, paragraph 2, clearly stipulates that "the people's court shall administer juvenile offenders." Sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment according to law, A criminal under the age of 18 years of life imprisonment shall carry out the punishment in a correctional facility for juvenile offenders and undergo educational reform. "since the law has also stipulated that the sentence of imprisonment of a minor shall be separate from that of an adult prisoner, Its execution mode should be different from that of adult criminals, but in reality, the execution of juvenile imprisonment in China is as highly adult as juvenile punishment. The existing execution mode is only a "relative separation" model that distinguishes the execution place from the adult offender. This mode is not only inconsistent with the characteristics of the minor, but also incompatible with the tendency of the juvenile imprisonment execution and the development of the juvenile justice system, which is not only in accordance with the characteristics of the minor, but also with the development of the juvenile justice system. Unable to meet the rational and realistic needs of juvenile imprisonment, the execution methods are not many, the execution system is rigid, the execution effect is not good, and so on. Therefore, this paper tries to clarify the theory of juvenile imprisonment execution on the basis of. By summing up and drawing lessons from domestic and foreign legitimate ideas and advanced experiences, combining with execution practice, this paper explores and constructs a "relatively independent" execution mode which is more in line with the purpose and purpose of punishment and can reflect the effect of execution. The first part gives a basic overview of the execution mode of juvenile imprisonment, briefly introduces the development process of juvenile imprisonment in China, and analyzes and compares the present situation of juvenile and adult imprisonment. In the second part, the author analyzes the connotation and main composition of the existing execution model from the two philosophical levels of content and form. Through the elaboration of the two levels, there is a contradiction that the content and form are not suitable for the mode itself. The main disadvantages and causes of the existing models are further analyzed. In the third part, the author makes an investigation on the execution of juvenile imprisonment in foreign countries, analyzes and compares the enlightenment and experience that can be used for reference in the light of the situation of our country. The fourth part explores the theoretical basis of the execution of juvenile imprisonment, on this basis, combined with the third part of the content of a comprehensive investigation of the main trends of juvenile imprisonment. The fifth part is the main body of this paper, on the basis of the first four parts of the study, discusses the specific perfection of the execution mode of juvenile imprisonment. Instead, it combines the game to form a more integrated system of the perfect scheme, each point of the previous deficiencies and each of the drawbacks in the overall scheme has been responded.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.7

【参考文献】