论审判公开与媒体监督

发布时间：2018-03-30 20:36

本文选题：审判公开　切入点：媒体监督　出处：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：审判公开制度作为民主社会里司法的应有形态,为保障审判的公正透明、满足人民群众知情权的需要贡献了重要力量。而媒体监督权是公民言论自由权、批评建议权的合理延伸,在促进司法公正、维护社会正义、遏制司法腐败、进行法制宣传等方面也发挥了积极作用。在当代,审判公开与媒体监督可说是既密切又矛盾的关系,共同的价值追求促成了二者互相配合、互相促进的良好局面,但在一些情形下,媒体监督的不当做法却成为了审判公开的明显阻力。如何在两者的冲突中寻求平衡,找到它们的合理限度,并营造有利于审判公开的媒体监督环境,成为笔者写作的初衷,亦是本文要研讨的重点。本文分三个部分,基本内容如下: 第一部分通过两起典型案例的引入,重点阐述审判公开与媒体监督冲突的表现,并对冲突的原因进行探究,从公众对司法公正的信任危机和媒体自身的角色错位两方面来进行剖析。第二部分也引入两起典型案例,对审判公开与媒体监督的统一性和可共存性进行论证,阐述媒体监督之于审判的积极意义,表达笔者对审判公开与媒体监督不可偏废的意见。第三部分是全篇的重点,笔者在前文的基础上,试图厘清审判公开与媒体监督的合理限度。通过对域外法的经验的借鉴,以及对中国立法司法实践的思考,重点从六方面为营造良好的媒体监督环境作出努力,包括设立平衡两者关系的指导原则、设定资格审查程序规范媒体直播报道行为、对媒体报道的限制适度放开、制定司法传媒行为统一规范、对媒体监督影响公正审判进行补救和新闻行业的自我调节。
[Abstract]:As a proper form of justice in a democratic society, the open trial system contributes an important power to ensure the fairness and transparency of the trial and to meet the needs of the people's right to know, while the right of media supervision is the right of citizens to freedom of speech. The rational extension of the right of criticism and suggestion has also played a positive role in promoting judicial justice, safeguarding social justice, curbing judicial corruption and propagating the legal system. In contemporary times, open trial and media supervision can be said to be a close and contradictory relationship. The pursuit of common values has contributed to a good situation in which the two cooperate and promote each other, but in some cases the improper practice of media supervision has become a clear resistance to open trials. How to strike a balance between the two conflicts, Finding their reasonable limits and creating a media supervision environment conducive to open trial becomes the original intention of the author's writing and is also the focus of this paper. This paper is divided into three parts, the basic content is as follows:. The first part, through the introduction of two typical cases, focuses on the performance of the conflict between open trial and media supervision, and explores the causes of the conflict. This paper analyzes the crisis of public trust in judicial justice and the mismatch of the media's own role. The second part also introduces two typical cases to demonstrate the unity and coexistence between open trial and media supervision, expounds the positive significance of media supervision in trial, and expresses the author's opinion on trial openness and media supervision. The third part is the focus of the whole article. On the basis of the above, the author tries to clarify the reasonable limits of open trial and media supervision. Focusing on six aspects of efforts to create a good media supervision environment, including the establishment of guiding principles to balance the relationship between the two, the establishment of a qualification review procedure to regulate the conduct of live media coverage, and the moderate release of restrictions on media reporting, To formulate uniform norms of judicial media behavior, to remedy the influence of media supervision on fair trial and to regulate itself in the news industry.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2;G206

【参考文献】