人民调解协议司法确认的法理思考及制度完善

发布时间：2018-03-31 00:10

本文选题：人民调解协议　切入点：司法确认　出处：《湖南师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：“人民调解协议司法确认"是推进多元化解决纠纷,搭建法院司法和人民调解对接平台的关键和纽带。本文结合司法运作实践,运用诉讼法理论和实证分析方法,围绕“人民调解协议司法确认”的界定、功能、缺陷及完善进行探讨,以期对推进多元化解纷机制建设有所裨益。全文分五章,分析了司法确认制度产生的背景,对国内外司法确认制度进行了简单对比,诠释了我国司法确认制度的内涵及特点,对该制度的积极功能与制度缺陷进行了客观分析,从弘扬司法确认制度的正面功能与价值的角度,就弥补司法确认制度的不足,完善程序设置提出了具体建议。如明确法院在司法确认中的角色定位、合理排除虚假司法确认、明确司法确认申请的风险、适当矫正不规范的人民调解协议等,同时提出了彰显司法确认功能的相关配套方案和建议。本论文在创作中参考和借鉴了大量的参考书籍和期刊,从诉权的基本理论以及多元化解纷制度的构建原理、ADR协议的效力等方面领悟相关的法的精神以及制度构建中利益权衡的方法,在文中还用到了本人所在单位一些改革的最新成果。笔者尝试理论与实践相结合的实证分析方法,对“人民调解协议的司法确认”这项新鲜出炉的制度进行研究。以“挑剔”的眼光审视最高法院刚出台的《若干规定》,提出了该制度推行过程中存在的五大缺陷和不足,尤其提出了“司法不能包揽解决全部社会矛盾和问题,司法确认只能是人民调解协议效力确认系统中的有限最终解决方案”的鲜明论点。
[Abstract]:"Judicial confirmation of people's Mediation Agreement" is the key and link to promote the pluralistic settlement of disputes and build the platform of court judicature and people's mediation. This paper applies the theory of procedural law and empirical analysis method in combination with judicial operation practice. This paper discusses the definition, function, defects and perfection of "Judicial confirmation of people's Mediation Agreement" in order to benefit the construction of diversified dispute resolution mechanism. The paper is divided into five chapters, and analyzes the background of judicial confirmation system. This paper makes a simple comparison of the judicial confirmation system at home and abroad, explains the connotation and characteristics of the judicial confirmation system in our country, and analyzes objectively the positive function and defects of the system. From the angle of carrying forward the positive function and value of the judicial confirmation system, this paper puts forward some concrete suggestions on how to make up the deficiency of the judicial confirmation system and perfect the procedure setting, such as clarifying the role of the court in the judicial confirmation and reasonably eliminating the false judicial confirmation. Make clear the risk of judicial confirmation application, properly correct the non-standard people's mediation agreement, and put forward the relevant supporting plans and suggestions to highlight the function of judicial confirmation. This paper has referenced and used for reference a large number of reference books and periodicals in the creation of this paper. From the basic theory of the right of action and the construction principle of the pluralistic dispute resolution system and the effectiveness of ADR agreement, the author understands the spirit of the relevant law and the method of balancing the interests in the construction of the system. In this paper, I also use some of the latest achievements of the reform of my unit. The author tries to combine theory with practice empirical analysis method, This paper studies the newly published system of "Judicial confirmation of people's Mediation Agreement". By examining the "certain provisions" just issued by the Supreme Court from a "picky" perspective, it puts forward five major defects and deficiencies in the implementation of this system. In particular, this paper puts forward a clear argument that "Justice cannot solve all social contradictions and problems, and judicial confirmation can only be a limited final solution in the system of confirming the validity of people's mediation agreement".
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】