“大调解”中的司法:表达与实践的悖论

发布时间：2018-04-18 15:53

  本文选题：“大调解” + 司法　； 参考：《北京社会科学》2017年09期

【摘要】：司法谋求在"大调解"中的主导地位,是为履行政治职能、提升司法"治权"及保障部门自身利益的需要。在权力的单边治理中,由于与行政机关在资源掌控与分配上的体制性不平衡,司法主导性停留在诉求层面,司法的实践形态与其官方表达相背离。诉诸"能动司法",亦无法解决表达与实践相分离的矛盾状态。这种矛盾的结合是当下中国司法参与社会运动式治理的根本特色。
[Abstract]:The leading position of judicial seeking in "Great Mediation" is the need to perform political function, to promote judicial "administration of power" and to safeguard the interests of the department itself.In the unilateral governance of power, because of the system imbalance of resources control and distribution with administrative organs, the judicial dominant stay at the level of appeal, the judicial practice form deviates from its official expression.Resort to "active justice" can not solve the contradictory state of separation between expression and practice.The combination of this contradiction is the fundamental feature of the current Chinese judicial participation in social movement governance.
【作者单位】： 西北师范大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(14CMZ009)
【分类号】：D926.2
，

本文编号：1769037