检察环节认罪认罚协商制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-17 12:24

本文选题：认罪认罚协商 + 参与人　；参考：《河南财经政法大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2016年9月3日上午,十二届全国人大常委会第二十二次会议表决通过了《关于授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的决定》,拉开了在18个城市进行认罪认罚从宽制度的序幕。认罪认罚协商制度是认罪认罚从宽制度在检察环节的表现,也是认罪协商制度在我国的首次实践,它独有的效率价值、谦抑宽容价值、程序民主价值及犯罪预防价值为我国当前的司法现状提供了方向,放眼国外协商性质的司法取得了很好的效果,审视国内认罪协商制度的构建刻不容缓。本研究基于《认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作办法》,提出系统构建我国检察环节认罪认罚协商制度的设想,通过重点分析认罪认罚协商制度的内涵以及它与其他既有从宽程序或制度的关系,明确该制度的实施理念,发现在具体实践中的可能出现的问题,比如对认罪标准、协商幅度需谨慎把控,对与其他从宽制度和程序的衔接适用需全面梳理,对本制度的适用范围、处理方式需定纷止争。继而从实体和程序双管齐下,规范该制度运行,一方面通过明确各位参与主体的各种权利来平衡各方利益,特别注重犯罪嫌疑人的律师帮助权和反悔权的保障,特别注意被害人的参与权和意见表达,检察机关应对此特别注意引导和规范;另一方面通过梳理认罪认罚协商的运作程序来规范该制度运行,比如对协商启动的方式、期间需明确,对认罪标准的把控、证据的合法使用需谨慎,对监督机制的细化需全面。认罪认罚协商制度是当前特定环境特定时代下的产物,我们在了解其诸多益处的同时更需洞察其固有的局限性,通过制度完善使其更适应实际需要,在追求效率的同时务必要兼顾公平公正。
[Abstract]:On the morning of September 3, 2016, the twenty-second meeting of the Standing Committee of the twelve National People's Congress voted on the decision to authorize the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate to carry out the pilot work of the criminal admission punishment and leniency system in some areas. It opened the prelude to the system of admission and punishment in 18 cities. The commercial system is the performance of the plea and penalty leniency system in the procuratorial link. It is also the first practice of the confession and consultation system in our country. Its unique efficiency value, modest and tolerant value, the procedural democratic value and the crime prevention value provide the direction for the current judicial status of our country, and the judiciary of foreign consultation has achieved good results. It is urgent to examine the construction of the domestic confession and consultation system. Based on the pilot work method of the plea leniency system, this paper proposes a systematic idea of establishing a system of confession and punishment consultation in China's procuratorial link. Through the analysis of the connotation of the system of confession and punishment consultation and its relationship with other existing procedures or systems, it is clear that The concept of the implementation of the system has found the possible problems in the concrete practice, such as the standard of pleading for the crime, the scope of consultation should be carefully controlled, the application of the system and the other broad systems and procedures should be fully combed, the scope of application and the way of handling of this system must be settled. On the one hand, to balance the interests of the parties by making clear the various rights of the participants, pay special attention to the protection of the right of help and the right of repact of the criminal suspects, and pay special attention to the rights of the victims and the expression of their opinions. The procuratorial organs should pay special attention to the guidance and standardization of the rights and opinions of the procuratorial organs. On the other hand, the operation procedure of the consultation of confession and punishment is combed. In order to regulate the operation of the system, such as the way to start the negotiation, the period should be clear, the standard of the plea is controlled, the legal use of the evidence needs to be cautious and the supervision mechanism is refined. The confession and punishment consultation system is the product of the specific environment of the present time, and we need to see its inherent advantages while understanding its many benefits. Limitations, through the system to make it more suited to the actual needs, in pursuit of efficiency at the same time must pay attention to fairness and justice.
【学位授予单位】：河南财经政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3

【参考文献】