民事审判中法官自由裁量权的正当行使和合理规制

发布时间：2018-05-31 11:10

本文选题：民事审判 + 自由裁量权　；参考：《西南财经大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：法官的自由裁量权问题是一个历久弥新的话题,这是因为它是司法体制中的关键问题,对我国法治的实现起着非常重要的作用。民事审判中法官的自由裁量权是一种客观上所拥有的权力,它是民事审判权具体使用法律的一种具体表现,在民事审判活动中具有至关重要的作用。在当今世界,无论是以成文法为主体的国家,还是以判例法为主体的国家,法官自由裁量权的客观存在都是毫无疑问的。自由裁量权的存在是法治与人治之间艰难选择的一种体现,是成文法自身缺陷的必然结果,它缓和了个别正义与普遍正义之间的冲突、法律漏洞,将纸面上争议运送到了现实生活当中,同时也维护了法律的价值。然而,如果法官的自由裁量权毫不受限制,将毫无疑问的导致法官对该自由裁量权的滥用,在我国司法体制尚不健全,法院尚不完全独立,法官的素质还亟待提高的情况下,法官不当行使自由裁量权的情况时有发生,随着司法改革的不断推进,司法自由裁量权开始逐渐成为全社会关注的焦点。合理规制法官的自由裁量权,对树立司法权威、司法公信力,起到了积极的作用。个别案件由于法官的自由裁量权的正当行使达到了良好的社会效果,使最佳的法律效力得以实现。本文从法官的民事司法裁量权的基本情况入手,论述了法官自由裁量权存在的必要性.详细的分析了中国民事审判中的法官自由裁量权不当行使的表现及其原因,并提出了对民事审判权法官自由裁量权的合理规制所应当采取的具体措施。希望通过本文的研究,能够对推动民事审判中法官自由裁量权的合理行使起到一定的借鉴的作用。
[Abstract]:The issue of judges' discretion is a new topic because it is a key issue in the judicial system and plays a very important role in the realization of the rule of law in our country. The discretion of judges in civil trial is an objectively owned power. It is a concrete manifestation of the use of law in civil jurisdiction and plays a vital role in civil trial activities. In today's world, there is no doubt about the objective existence of the discretion of judges, whether in countries with statutory law as the main body or case law as the main body. The existence of discretion is a manifestation of the difficult choice between the rule of law and the rule of man, and the inevitable result of the defects of statute law itself. It alleviates the conflict between individual justice and universal justice, and the legal loopholes. Disputes on paper are transported to real life, while preserving the value of the law. However, if the discretion of the judge is not restricted, it will undoubtedly lead to the abuse of the discretion by the judge. Under the condition that the judicial system is not perfect, the court is not completely independent and the quality of the judge needs to be improved, The improper exercise of discretion by judges occurs from time to time. With the continuous advancement of judicial reform, judicial discretion has gradually become the focus of attention of the whole society. Reasonable regulation of the discretion of judges plays a positive role in establishing judicial authority and judicial credibility. Individual cases have achieved good social effect due to the proper exercise of the judge's discretion, and the best legal effect has been realized. Starting from the basic situation of the judge's civil judicial discretion, this paper discusses the necessity of the existence of the judge's discretion. This paper analyzes in detail the performance and causes of the improper exercise of the judge's discretion in the civil trial in China, and puts forward the concrete measures to be taken for the rational regulation of the judge's discretion in the civil trial. It is hoped that the research in this paper can play a certain reference role in promoting the rational exercise of the judge's discretion in civil trial.
【学位授予单位】：西南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.1;D926.2

【参考文献】