法院案件质量管理行政化与去行政化

发布时间：2018-06-01 12:03

本文选题：人民法院 + 案件质量管理　；参考：《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：案件质量管理是最高人民法院及地方各级人民法院针对我国司法实践中较为突出的案件质量偏差以及司法公信力日益降低等现实问题所作的回应。然而由于我国现行案件质量管理组织机构及其运行程序极端科层化,原本以重拾司法规律、凸显裁判权威以及克服法院内部行政化之名而进行的审判管理改革,最后竟以强行政化而告终。结果是理应具有独立地位及自主判断权的法官被整合进层层权力之网,深陷重重监督和考核难以自拔。为了实现案件质量管理提升案件质量、增进司法公正、规范司法活动的初始目标,亟需对其予以进一步调整和完善。
[Abstract]:Case quality management is the response of the Supreme people's Court and the local people's courts at all levels to the practical problems such as the outstanding deviation of the case quality and the decreasing judicial credibility in our country's judicial practice. However, due to the extreme stratification of the current case quality management organization and its operating procedures, the trial management reform was originally carried out in order to regain the law of justice, highlight the authority of the adjudication and overcome the name of the internal administration of the court. Finally, it ended in a strong administration. As a result, judges who are supposed to have independent status and independent judgment power are integrated into the network of powers, and they are trapped in numerous supervision and examination. In order to realize the case quality management, improve the case quality, improve the judicial justice and standardize the initial goal of judicial activities, it is necessary to further adjust and perfect it.
【作者单位】：云南大学法学院;四川大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究基金规划项目“法院案件管理机制实证研究”(12YJA820050) 中国法学会部级法学研究青年调研项目“云南少数民族地区法官流失与基层法官生存状况实证研究”(CLS(2015)Y11)
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】