从司法ADR的角度论我国法院调解制度的重构
发布时间:2018-06-15 23:17
本文选题:司法ADR + 法院调解 ; 参考:《山东大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:ADR是Alternative Dispute Resolution的简写,一般翻译为“替代性纠纷解决方式”,是二十世纪逐步发展起来的各种诉讼外纠纷解决方式的总称。自上个世纪七十年代美国将ADR引入到诉讼程序起,ADR就具有了准司法的性质,从而形成了司法ADR制度。司法ADR具有便于解决纠纷、降低纠纷解决成本、维护社会稳定等功能,有利于克服诉讼裁判固有的弊端,有利于构建和谐社会,促进社会的可持续发展。随着诉讼需求的急剧上升和诉讼资源不足的矛盾日益突出,越来越多的国家寻求诉讼外解决纠纷,司法ADR以其特有的优势受到无可比拟的青睐。我国的法院调解制度是我国民事纠纷解决的重要方式,对促进社会的发展与稳定起到了重要作用,但随着时代的发展,其弊端愈加明显,因此对其进行改革是必然的趋势。司法ADR的迅速发展及其良好的运行效果极大地冲击我国的司法理念,无论是理论界还是实务界都开始积极探索多元化纠纷解决方式的建立。因此,我们可以借鉴其他国家司法ADR的理念,重构我国的法院调解制度,使其更有效地化解社会矛盾,促进社会的稳定与发展。 本文首先通过对司法ADR基本问题的研究和比较法考察,分析司法ADR对重构我国法院调解制度的启示;其次通过分析我国法院法院调解存在的问题,论述司法ADR与我国法院调解制度的衔接与融合,最后对重构我国法院调解制度提出具体的构想。 第一部分,司法ADR的概述。首先研究司法ADR制度的基础理论,主要阐述了其定义、性质、特征和功能。其次,通过介绍司法ADR在部分国家和地区的实践状况,分析其对重构我国法院调解制度的启示。 第二部分,司法ADR与我国法院调解制度的衔接与融合。首先从我国法院调解存在的问题出发,阐述司法ADR制度是重构我国法院调解的突破口,其次论述司法ADR融入我国法院调解制度的可能性,最后说明我国引入司法ADR的可行性。 第三部分,我国法院调解制度的重构。针对我国法院调解存在的问题,借鉴国外的司法ADR,提出重构法院调解制度的具体设想。
[Abstract]:ADR is the abbreviation of Alternative dispute Resolution, which is generally translated as "alternative dispute Resolution", which is the general term of various non-litigation dispute resolution methods developed gradually in the 20th century. Since the United States introduced ADR into the legal proceedings in the 1970s, ADR has had a quasi-judicial nature, thus forming the judicial ADR system. Judicial ADR has the functions of resolving disputes, reducing the cost of dispute resolution, maintaining social stability, and so on. It is helpful to overcome the inherent malpractice of litigation adjudication, to build a harmonious society and to promote the sustainable development of the society. With the sharp rise of litigation demand and the contradiction of insufficient litigation resources, more and more countries seek to resolve disputes outside litigation. Judicial ADR is favored by unparalleled due to its unique advantages. The court mediation system in our country is an important way to resolve civil disputes, which plays an important role in promoting the development and stability of the society. However, with the development of the times, its drawbacks become more and more obvious, so it is an inevitable trend to reform it. The rapid development of judicial ADR and its good effect greatly impact on the judicial idea of our country. Both theoretical and practical circles have started to actively explore the establishment of diversified dispute resolution. Therefore, we can learn from the concept of judicial ADR in other countries, reconstruct our court mediation system, make it more effective to resolve social contradictions and promote social stability and development. This paper first analyzes the enlightenment of judicial ADR to the reconstruction of our country's court mediation system through the study of the basic problems of judicial ADR and comparative law, and then analyzes the problems existing in the court mediation in our country. This paper discusses the connection and fusion of judicial ADR and the court mediation system of our country, and finally puts forward the concrete conception to reconstruct the court mediation system of our country. The first part is the summary of judicial ADR. First, the basic theory of judicial ADR system is studied, including its definition, nature, features and functions. Secondly, by introducing the practice of judicial ADR in some countries and regions, this paper analyzes the enlightenment of judicial ADR to the reconstruction of our country's court mediation system. The second part, the connection and fusion of judicial ADR and Chinese court mediation system. Starting from the problems existing in the court mediation in our country, this paper expounds that judicial ADR system is a breakthrough in the reconstruction of court mediation in our country, and then discusses the possibility of judicial ADR integrating into the court mediation system in our country, and finally explains the feasibility of introducing judicial ADR into our country. The third part, the reconstruction of our country's court mediation system. In view of the problems existing in the court mediation in our country, this paper puts forward the concrete idea of reconstructing the court mediation system by referring to the foreign judicial ADRs.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 章武生;司法ADR之研究[J];法学评论;2003年02期
2 肖建国;;司法ADR建构中的委托调解制度研究——以中国法院的当代实践为中心[J];法学评论;2009年03期
3 克丽斯蒂娜·沃波鲁格;替代诉讼的纠纷解决方式(ADR)[J];河北法学;1998年01期
4 李浩;民事审判中的调审分离[J];法学研究;1996年04期
5 张晋红;法院调解的立法价值探究——兼评法院调解的两种改良观点[J];法学研究;1998年05期
6 刘亚玲;;司法ADR与我国法院非诉讼纠纷解决机制的构建[J];诉讼法论丛;2005年00期
7 熊先舸;;我国法院委托调解制度的实施构想[J];湖南税务高等专科学校学报;2009年01期
8 贾连杰,陈攀;从美国的ADR看我国诉讼调解的困境与出路[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2000年01期
9 郭玉军,甘勇;美国选择性争议解决方式(ADR)介评[J];中国法学;2000年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 乔欣 王克楠;[N];法制日报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 尹玉田;司法ADR研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
,本文编号:2024071
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2024071.html