司法活动中矫正正义研究
发布时间：2018-08-26 11:35
【摘要】：矫正正义是指对已经破坏的正义内容进行恢复和弥补的一种符合正义要求的规则和原则。矫正正义的核心是适当的追究责任,对不公正行为进行纠正和禁止时,必须符合法定性、公正性、适当性、文明性等原则。然而在司法活动中对非正义行为的矫正却存在着诸多的不公正,刑讯逼供、非法取证等导致的冤假错案大量存在。这些不公的事实极大地影响司法公正的实现,破坏社会的和谐和稳定。 本文从伦理学的视角对矫正正义的根据和原则进行了全面的梳理,以此来追问司法矫正正义的道德合理性,目的是为了避免司法活动中矫枉过正或矫枉不过正等不公正问题的出现,从而实现司法公正。文章首先讨论了司法和矫正正义的关系,着重的介绍了司法的产生和本质,矫正正义的界定和发展渊源；随后对不同伦理学派的矫正正义理论进行论述,从道德报应论、功利主义惩罚论以及恢复性正义三个方面对矫正正义实现的根据据及遵循的原则进行了阐述并作出评价。最后,结合我国司法建设的现实情况,分析我国司法矫正正义存在的问题并提出实现司法矫正正义的思路。
[Abstract]:Corrective justice is a kind of rule and principle which accords with the request of justice. The core of corrective justice is to investigate the responsibility properly. When correcting and prohibiting the unjust behavior, it must conform to the principles of legality, fairness, appropriateness, civilization, etc. However, there are many injustices in the judicial activities, such as extorting confessions by torture, obtaining evidence illegally and so on. These unfair facts greatly affect the realization of judicial justice and undermine social harmony and stability. From the perspective of ethics, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the basis and principle of corrective justice, in order to inquire into the moral rationality of judicial correction justice. The purpose is to avoid the problem of injustice in judicial activities, so as to realize judicial justice. The article first discusses the relationship between justice and corrective justice, mainly introduces the emergence and essence of justice, the definition and development origin of corrective justice, and then discusses the theory of correction justice of different ethical schools, and discusses the theory of moral retribution from the perspective of moral retribution. The theory of utilitarian punishment and restorative justice expounds and evaluates the basis and principle of the realization of corrective justice. Finally, according to the reality of judicial construction in our country, this paper analyzes the existing problems of judicial correction justice in China and puts forward the idea of realizing judicial correction justice.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D926;B82-051
本文编号：2204750
[Abstract]:Corrective justice is a kind of rule and principle which accords with the request of justice. The core of corrective justice is to investigate the responsibility properly. When correcting and prohibiting the unjust behavior, it must conform to the principles of legality, fairness, appropriateness, civilization, etc. However, there are many injustices in the judicial activities, such as extorting confessions by torture, obtaining evidence illegally and so on. These unfair facts greatly affect the realization of judicial justice and undermine social harmony and stability. From the perspective of ethics, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the basis and principle of corrective justice, in order to inquire into the moral rationality of judicial correction justice. The purpose is to avoid the problem of injustice in judicial activities, so as to realize judicial justice. The article first discusses the relationship between justice and corrective justice, mainly introduces the emergence and essence of justice, the definition and development origin of corrective justice, and then discusses the theory of correction justice of different ethical schools, and discusses the theory of moral retribution from the perspective of moral retribution. The theory of utilitarian punishment and restorative justice expounds and evaluates the basis and principle of the realization of corrective justice. Finally, according to the reality of judicial construction in our country, this paper analyzes the existing problems of judicial correction justice in China and puts forward the idea of realizing judicial correction justice.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D926;B82-051
【共引文献】
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 赵一霖;唐五代人的精怪想象[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
2 张玉堂;边沁功利主义分析法学研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 夏菲;论英国警察权的变迁[D];华东政法大学;2010年
4 尹伟琴;民国祭田法律制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
5 许青松;间接正犯研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
6 张东平;近代中国监狱的感化教育研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
7 李俊义;非政府间国际组织的国际法律地位研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
8 陈琦;海上人身损害赔偿制度论[D];大连海事大学;2010年
9 刘卫先;后代人权利论批判[D];中国海洋大学;2010年
10 赵一强;知识社会价值的道德分析[D];苏州大学;2010年
，本文编号：2204750
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2204750.html
