司法职业化背景下的能动司法探析
发布时间：2018-09-13 11:34
【摘要】：能动司法在转型时期的中国当代社会有着特殊的存在意义。自从现代法治理念传播以来，规则主义至上以及严守法律形式主义就是现代国家在司法中被普遍接受和运用的主张。但是，随着社会生产方式的迅速变化和发展，各种新型的疑难案件越来越多，导致不加分析地严守司法规则主义，可能对一些疑难复杂案件而言，反倒不能更好地解决。我国正处在社会转型时期，社会的变革使得社会关系日趋复杂，价值判断日益多元化，另外全球金融危机对我国经济发展产生了严重的影响，形成了各种利益纠纷。此时能动司法措施的出台在一定程度上有效化解了各种司法难题。但是，在长远的法治建设过程中，能否把能动司法作为我国司法发展的长远路径？我国法治的建设到底需要继续司法职业化发展还是需要转向能动司法的路径？这个问题引起了学术界激烈的讨论，这也是本文的问题来源。 本文总共分为五个部分，第一部分引言中着重对本文问题缘起做了介绍。在问题缘起部分，厘清了我国司法改革发展的前一阶段即司法职业化的发展所存在的问题，为能动司法的出现做一个背景铺垫，接而讨论司法改革的另一措施即能动司法，，把本文着重讨论的关键词做简要介绍。 第二部分是文章正文的第一部分。主要对中国语境下的能动司法进行简述。首先区分了能动司法与司法能动主义之间的关系，然后分析能动司法出现的背景因素,最后再对能动司法的内涵进行细致地论述。 第三部分主要讨论能动司法的实践及其效果。先把全国各地有代表性的做法进行细致的介绍，然后再根据具体的实践效果分析出能动司法的合理性因素。 第四部分着重分析能动司法所存在的问题。主要是如何处理好能动司法与司法职业化之间的关系，本文讨论了在当今的社会现实下，应该以解决当下司法发展过程中出现的问题为首要考虑，然后再从长远的法治建设角度着想，应该着力发展司法职业化道路。 第五部分是文章的结语。对我国能动司法存在的问题分析完以后，本部分开始探析能动司法的出路，即能动司法对我国司法改革走向的启示。在我国司法改革的过程中，就是在不断地自我修正中趋近于更加合理化的路径。
[Abstract]:The active judicature has special existence significance in the Chinese contemporary society in the transitional period. Since the spread of the concept of modern rule of law, the supremacy of rule of law and strict observance of legal formalism are the general acceptance and application of modern countries in the administration of justice. However, with the rapid change and development of the social production mode, more and more new types of difficult cases, leading to strict adherence to judicial rules without analysis, may not be able to better solve some difficult and complex cases. Our country is in the social transition period, the social transformation makes the social relationship increasingly complex, the value judgment is increasingly diversified, in addition, the global financial crisis has had the serious influence to our country economy development, has formed various kinds of benefit disputes. At this time, the introduction of active judicial measures to a certain extent effectively resolved a variety of judicial problems. However, in the long-term construction of the rule of law, can we take active justice as the long-term path of judicial development in our country? Does the construction of the rule of law in our country need to continue the development of judicial professionalization or to turn to the path of active justice? This problem has aroused heated discussion in academic circles, which is also the source of the problem in this paper. This paper is divided into five parts, the first part of the introduction focuses on the origin of this problem. In the part of the origin of the problem, it clarifies the problems existing in the development of judicial professionalization in the previous stage of the development of judicial reform in our country, and provides a background for the emergence of active judicature, and then discusses another measure of judicial reform, that is, the active judicature. The key words discussed in this paper are briefly introduced. The second part is the first part of the text. This paper mainly introduces the active judicature in the context of China. This paper first distinguishes the relationship between active judicature and judicial activism, then analyzes the background factors of active judicature, and then discusses the connotation of active judicature in detail. The third part mainly discusses the practice and effect of active justice. Firstly, it introduces the representative practices in various parts of the country, and then analyzes the rational factors of active judicature according to the concrete practical effect. The fourth part focuses on the analysis of the problems existing in active justice. How to deal with the relationship between active judicature and judicial professionalization is discussed in this paper. In the present social reality, the first consideration should be to solve the problems in the course of judicial development. Then from the perspective of long-term construction of the rule of law, we should focus on developing the road of judicial professionalization. The fifth part is the conclusion of the article. After analyzing the existing problems of active judicature in our country, this part begins to analyze the outlet of active judicature, that is, the enlightenment of active judicature to the trend of judicial reform in our country. In the process of judicial reform in our country, it is in the process of self-revision to get closer to a more rational path.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
本文编号：2241055
[Abstract]:The active judicature has special existence significance in the Chinese contemporary society in the transitional period. Since the spread of the concept of modern rule of law, the supremacy of rule of law and strict observance of legal formalism are the general acceptance and application of modern countries in the administration of justice. However, with the rapid change and development of the social production mode, more and more new types of difficult cases, leading to strict adherence to judicial rules without analysis, may not be able to better solve some difficult and complex cases. Our country is in the social transition period, the social transformation makes the social relationship increasingly complex, the value judgment is increasingly diversified, in addition, the global financial crisis has had the serious influence to our country economy development, has formed various kinds of benefit disputes. At this time, the introduction of active judicial measures to a certain extent effectively resolved a variety of judicial problems. However, in the long-term construction of the rule of law, can we take active justice as the long-term path of judicial development in our country? Does the construction of the rule of law in our country need to continue the development of judicial professionalization or to turn to the path of active justice? This problem has aroused heated discussion in academic circles, which is also the source of the problem in this paper. This paper is divided into five parts, the first part of the introduction focuses on the origin of this problem. In the part of the origin of the problem, it clarifies the problems existing in the development of judicial professionalization in the previous stage of the development of judicial reform in our country, and provides a background for the emergence of active judicature, and then discusses another measure of judicial reform, that is, the active judicature. The key words discussed in this paper are briefly introduced. The second part is the first part of the text. This paper mainly introduces the active judicature in the context of China. This paper first distinguishes the relationship between active judicature and judicial activism, then analyzes the background factors of active judicature, and then discusses the connotation of active judicature in detail. The third part mainly discusses the practice and effect of active justice. Firstly, it introduces the representative practices in various parts of the country, and then analyzes the rational factors of active judicature according to the concrete practical effect. The fourth part focuses on the analysis of the problems existing in active justice. How to deal with the relationship between active judicature and judicial professionalization is discussed in this paper. In the present social reality, the first consideration should be to solve the problems in the course of judicial development. Then from the perspective of long-term construction of the rule of law, we should focus on developing the road of judicial professionalization. The fifth part is the conclusion of the article. After analyzing the existing problems of active judicature in our country, this part begins to analyze the outlet of active judicature, that is, the enlightenment of active judicature to the trend of judicial reform in our country. In the process of judicial reform in our country, it is in the process of self-revision to get closer to a more rational path.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈胜强;;论能动司法的本土资源[J];电子科技大学学报(社科版);2011年01期
2 罗东川;丁广宇;;论能动司法应处理好的几个关系[J];法律适用;2010年10期
3 夏锦文;;当下能动司法亟待处理的六大关系及解决思路[J];法律适用;2010年10期
4 苏力;;关于能动司法[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
5 顾培东;;司法能动主义的蕴含[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
6 罗东川;丁广宇;;我国能动司法的理论与实践评述[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
7 王建国;;司法能动与纠纷解决[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
8 章武生;;论我国大调解机制的构建——兼析大调解与ADR的关系[J];法商研究;2007年06期
9 方乐;;能动司法的模式与方法[J];法学;2011年01期
10 邱飞;通过法律职业化进路的司法改革[J];法学论坛;2005年02期
本文编号：2241055
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2241055.html
