论我国民事检察监督模式的转换

发布时间：2019-06-28 10:50

【摘要】：在当前我国突出强调民事审判监督的社会背景下,检察机关仍应慎重拓展民事监督领域,事后监督为主的基本制度框架仍需坚持。而就比较成熟的民事抗诉制度而言,适度的模式转换成为当前我国民事检察监督走出困境的突破口。出于对法院独立审判的尊重,以及实体监督情境性和监督标准不确定性的考虑,检察机关应逐步放弃实体监督为主导的监督模式。比较而言,程序公正的重要性使得民事检察程序监督地位更为突出,同时,监督标准的确定性也使程序监督较为便利。因此,由实体监督为主转向以程序监督为主的监督模式,同时兼顾实体裁判显著错误案件的监督,是当前我国检察机关顺利开展民事检察监督工作的现实选择。
[Abstract]:At present, under the social background of emphasizing civil trial supervision in our country, procuratorial organs should still carefully expand the field of civil supervision, and the basic institutional framework of supervision after the event still needs to be adhered to. As far as the more mature civil protest system is concerned, the moderate mode transformation has become a breakthrough for the civil procuratorial supervision in our country to get out of the predicament at present. In order to respect the independent trial of the court, as well as the circumstances of the entity supervision and the uncertainty of the supervision standard, the procuratorial organ should gradually abandon the supervision mode led by the entity supervision. In comparison, the importance of procedural justice makes the supervision of civil procuratorial procedure more prominent, at the same time, the certainty of supervision standards also makes the procedural supervision more convenient. Therefore, it is the realistic choice for the procuratorial organs of our country to carry out the civil procuratorial supervision smoothly at present, which is from entity supervision to procedural supervision, and at the same time, taking into account the supervision of significant errors in entity adjudication is the realistic choice for procuratorial organs in our country to carry out civil procuratorial supervision smoothly.
【作者单位】：广东医学院;西南政法大学;河南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.3;D925.1

【参考文献】