监事会代表诉讼制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-05 03:04

本文关键词：监事会代表诉讼制度研究　出处：《苏州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：监事会代表诉讼通常是指当公司与本公司的董事、高级管理人员等公司内部人之间有诉讼行为产生时,由监事会以公司名义、代表公司为诉讼行为的一种诉讼程序。监事会代表诉讼是公司追究董事、高级管理人员违反法律、行政法规或公司章程的法律责任的有效方式,其有利于强化监事会的权力刚性以完善公司治理,进而维护公司利益。我国现行《公司法》第53条第(6)项以及第151条第1款仅对监事会代表诉讼作粗线条规定,缺少系统的实施程序,致使该制度在司法实践中难以适用,相关案例也较为鲜见。因此,我国监事会代表诉讼制度亟待完善以实现其应有价值。本文通过对大陆法系国家和地区的先进立法例进行比较研究,针对我国监事会代表诉讼立法上不足提出若干完善建议。本文共分为三个部分,主要内容归纳如下:第一部分为监事会代表诉讼的基本理论。首先,本文引用真实的监事会代表诉讼案例以说明该制度在我国司法实践中适用困境。其次,主要界定了监事会代表诉讼的基本概念,着重比较了公司内部机构间诉讼和公司机构代表诉讼的异同,并总结分析监事会代表诉讼的基本法律特征,同时主要从立法方面对我国的监事会代表诉讼制度进行考察,以时间为线索展现该制度的历史演变过程。最后,该部分详细阐述监事会代表诉讼的理论基础和制度价值,主要以分权制衡理论和公司代表权等理论阐释监事会代表诉讼在理论上的合理性以及监事会代表诉讼在制约董事和高级管理人员的方面的重要作用及在完善公司治理方面的现实意义。第二部分为监事会代表诉讼的立法例比较分析。依次介绍了德国、日本、韩国和我国台湾地区对监事会代表诉讼的立法规定和实施状况。通过比较法分别对上述立法例进行分析比较,总结大陆法系关于监事会代表诉讼的先进立法经验以及对我国立法的借鉴意义,例如监事会对外享有公司代表权以及享有提起代表诉讼的诉讼决议权等。第三部分为我国监事会代表诉讼的完善。与大陆法系先进的立法规定对比,指出我国监事会代表诉讼在立法上的不足之处以及实践中存在的适用困境,例如监事会代表权制度缺失,代表诉讼适用范围狭窄以及缺少具体实施程序等等,并针对上述立法不足和适用困境提出完善监事会代表权、完善具体实施程序、拓展适用范围以及增加配套措施的建议,以期可以更好地发挥监事会代表诉讼的积极作用。
[Abstract]:The representative litigation of the board of supervisors usually means that when there is a lawsuit between the company and the directors, senior managers and other insiders of the company, the board of supervisors shall act in the name of the company. Representing the company is a kind of litigation procedure. The representative action of the board of supervisors is an effective way for the company to investigate the legal liability of the directors and senior managers for violating the laws, administrative regulations or articles of association of the company. It helps to strengthen the power rigidity of the board of supervisors to improve corporate governance. Then protect the interests of the company. Our current "Company Law" Article 53 (6) and article 151 (1) only on behalf of the Board of Supervisors litigation rough provisions, the lack of systematic implementation procedures. This system is difficult to apply in judicial practice, and the relevant cases are relatively rare. In order to realize its due value, China's board of supervisors' representative litigation system needs to be improved urgently. This paper makes a comparative study on the advanced legislation cases in the countries and regions of the continental law system. This paper is divided into three parts. The main content is summarized as follows: the first part is the basic theory of the board of supervisors representative litigation. First of all. This article cited the real board of supervisors representative litigation cases to illustrate the application of the system in China's judicial practice difficulties. Secondly, it mainly defines the basic concept of the board of supervisors representative litigation. This paper mainly compares the similarities and differences between inter-agency litigation and corporate agency representative litigation, and summarizes and analyzes the basic legal characteristics of the board of supervisors' representative litigation. At the same time, mainly from the legislative aspect of the board of supervisors representative litigation system to investigate, time as a clue to show the historical evolution of the system. Finally. This part elaborates the theoretical basis and system value of the representative action of the board of supervisors. The theory of separation of powers and checks and balances and the theory of corporate representation are used to explain the theoretical rationality of the representative litigation of the board of supervisors, the important role of the representative litigation of the board of supervisors in restricting the directors and senior managers and the improvement of the company. The second part is the comparative analysis of the legislative cases of the board of supervisors' representative litigation. Japan, South Korea and Taiwan region of China on the board of supervisors on behalf of the legislative provisions and implementation of litigation. Through comparative law to analyze and compare the above-mentioned legislative cases. Summing up the advanced legislative experience of the board of supervisors' representative litigation in the civil law system and the reference significance to the legislation of our country. For example, the board of supervisors enjoy the representation of the company and the litigation resolution right to bring the representative action. The third part is the perfection of the representative action of the board of supervisors in our country, which is compared with the advanced legislative provisions of the civil law system. It points out the defects in the legislation and the difficulties of application in practice, such as the absence of the system of representation of the board of supervisors, the narrow scope of application of the representative litigation and the lack of specific implementation procedures and so on. And in view of the lack of legislation and difficulties in the application of the board of supervisors to improve the representation, improve the specific implementation procedures, expand the scope of application and increase the supporting measures. With a view to better play the board of supervisors on behalf of the positive role of litigation.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】