董事问责的诚信路径研究

发布时间：2018-01-31 01:42

本文关键词： 商事判断规则客观诚信注意义务忠实义务董事失信　出处：《中央民族大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：董事问责的诚信路径是在传统公司法上董事的注意义务和忠实义务的基础上,赋予公司董事以诚信义务,赋予诚信义务以独立地位,将诚信义务和注意义务、忠实义务并驾齐驱,确立董事信义义务三分法。董事问责的诚信路径对现代市场经济中公司的长远健康发展以及董事信义义务的实现均具有重要的现实意义。本文以董事的诚信义务为研究对象,主要是基于传统公司法上的注意义务和忠实义务难以涵射董事的所有失信行为,本文从分析诚信义务产生的原因入手,阐述分析董事诚信义务的独立地位,在分析董事问责缝隙的基础上,提出董事诚信义务的问责对象。论文共分六个部分,由导论开篇,其后由四章组成文章的主体部分,最后由结语收尾。导论部分主要说明论文选题的背景和研究意义,介绍论文写作思路以及研究方法,并指出论文存在的不足。第一章以诚信路径产生的缘由为题,运用实证分析和比较分析相结合的方法指出董事诚信义务产生的原因。通过辨证分析董事享有的权利和义务以及传统意义上董事注意义务存在的缺陷,论证出在董事失信的情形下,董事诚信义务存在的必要性第二章以诚信路径的产生为题,在前述的基础理论上,主要就诚信义务的法律地位进行分析研究,通过比较传统意义上主观诚信的不足,提出客观诚信,进而论证出诚信义务具有独立的法律地位,并以行为标准确立诚信义务。第三章以诚信义务的问责功能为题,在前述分析诚信义务具有独立的法律地位的基础上,运用规范分析和比较分析的方法论证出诚信路径是董事问责空隙的填补机制、股东信息上下一致的约束机制以及公司交易中善意第三人的保护机制。第四章以诚信义务的问责对象以及我国董事问责诚信路径的构建为题,指出诚信义务的问责对象,将董事故意让公司违法、不坦诚告知、滥用职权以及严重失职的情形纳入到董事诚信义务的涵射范畴,并希冀我国能够通过《公司法》的司法解释界定诚信义务的行为标准,从而引入诚信问责路径。结语部分总结全文,进一步强调董事诚信义务存在的重要意义,并指出将诚信义务与传统的注意义务和忠实义务并驾齐驱的信义义务三分法也为我国司法实践中董事的问责道路提供了指引。
[Abstract]:The good faith path of directors' accountability is based on the directors' duty of care and loyalty in the traditional company law, which endows the directors with the duty of good faith, gives the duty of good faith with the independent status, and gives the duty of good faith and duty of care. The faithful obligation goes hand in hand and establishes the three-point law of directors' fiduciary duty. The good faith path of directors' accountability is of great practical significance to the long-term healthy development of the company in the modern market economy and the realization of the director's fiduciary duty. This article takes the director's good faith duty as the research object, is mainly based on the traditional company law duty of care and the faithful duty cannot contain all the directors' discredit behavior, this article starts with the analysis of the reason of the good faith obligation. On the basis of analyzing the gap of directors' accountability, this paper expounds the independent position of directors' fiduciary obligation, and puts forward the object of directors' fiduciary duty. The thesis is divided into six parts, which is opened by introduction. After that, it consists of four chapters, and ends with the conclusion. The introduction mainly explains the background and significance of the thesis, introduces the ideas and research methods of the thesis, and points out the shortcomings of the thesis. The first chapter focuses on the cause of the path of good faith. Using the combination of empirical analysis and comparative analysis, this paper points out the reasons of directors' bona fide obligations. Through dialectical analysis of directors' rights and obligations and the defects of traditional directors' duty of care. This paper demonstrates the necessity of the director's fiduciary duty under the circumstance of the director's dishonesty. The second chapter focuses on the emergence of the path of good faith, in the aforementioned basic theory, mainly on the legal status of the obligation of good faith analysis and research, by comparing the traditional sense of the lack of subjective integrity, put forward the objective integrity. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the duty of good faith has independent legal status, and establishes the obligation of good faith according to the standard of conduct. The third chapter focuses on the accountability function of the bona fide obligation on the basis of the above analysis that the bona fide obligation has an independent legal status. By means of normative analysis and comparative analysis, it is demonstrated that the good faith path is the mechanism to fill the gap between directors' accountability, the constraint mechanism of the consistent information of shareholders and the protection mechanism of bona fide third party in the company transaction. Chapter 4th focuses on the accountability object of the duty of good faith and the construction of the path of the honesty and credit of the director of our country, points out the object of the accountability of the obligation of good faith, and tells the director intentionally that the company is in violation of the law. Abuse of power and serious dereliction of duty are brought into the category of directors' fiduciary duty, and it is hoped that our country can define the behavior standard of good faith obligation through the judicial interpretation of Company Law. In order to introduce integrity accountability path. The conclusion part summarizes the full text, further emphasizes the director good faith duty existence significance. It is also pointed out that the three-point fiduciary obligation, which equates the duty of good faith with the traditional duty of care and duty of loyalty, also provides guidance for the accountability of directors in judicial practice in our country.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】