股权投资尽职调查中的董事义务法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-12 23:02

本文选题：尽职调查　切入点：董事　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：股权投资尽职调查是股权投资过程中，公司董事为了实现公司利益最大化，并且为了避免投资过程中出现因为未对相对方公司信息进行全方位了解而对本公司、股东承担法律责任的必经程序和免责事由。本篇论文从尽职调查这一法律概念起源谈起，通过对不同法系国家对公司董事在股权投资尽职调查中所承担的法律义务进行比较、分析，，进行论述公司董事所负各种不同的法律义务，阐释董事在股权投资尽职调查过程中的法律义务问题，并对我国相关立法提出完善的建议。本篇论文共分五章：第一章引言。本章主要介绍本文对公司董事在股权投资尽职调查过程中的法律义务进行研究的背景及意义，以及对所引用国内外文献简述。本文研究的目的在于当前国内股权投资蓬勃发展,而与尽职调查及相关董事法律问题立法却尚显欠缺，带着解决这一问题的目的展开一定层面上的研究。第二章股权投资的尽职调查。介绍了尽职调查概念的起源及法律分类，以及在英美法系、大陆法系国家不同的法律地位，并对我国目前相关立法进行了阐述。第三章股权投资尽职调查中的董事义务。信义义务是公司董事在尽职调查过程中一切法律义务的基础，告知义务是信义义务的重要体现，是董事履行信义义务的风向标。本章对董事在尽职调查中的法律义务进行了论述，对董事信义义务的理论依据和主要内容进行了较为完整的阐述，同时也指出了我国公司法体系在这一方面立法上的不足和欠缺。第四章股权投资尽职调查中的董事职责标准和法律责任。本章共二节，第一节论述公司董事在对股权投资进行尽职调查时,如何达到向股东约定或承诺的勤勉、尽职的标准，以及围绕我国相关规定论述在法律有明确规定的情形下董事如何达到法律规定的职责标准。第二节从两个角度对股权投资尽职调查中的董事应负的法律责任进行阐述。以我国立法和国外相关立法进行比较，并以董事对公司应负法律责任和对股东应负法律责任进行比较，从对董事责任应课以何种归责原则认定董事责任进行阐述，从多个方位、角度，采用对中、外立法的比较、分析方法来进行论证。
[Abstract]:Due diligence of equity investment is the process of equity investment, in order to maximize the company's interests, and to avoid appearing in the investment process because of the lack of a comprehensive understanding of the relative company information to the company. The necessary procedure and exoneration for shareholders to bear legal liability. This paper begins with the origin of the legal concept of due diligence and analyzes the legal obligations of directors in equity investment due diligence in different legal system countries. This paper discusses the different legal obligations of company directors, explains the legal obligations of directors in the process of equity investment due diligence, and puts forward some suggestions on the relevant legislation of our country. This paper is divided into five chapters:. The first chapter introduces the background and significance of the research on the legal obligations of directors in the process of equity investment due diligence. The purpose of this paper is to develop the domestic equity investment vigorously, but the legislation on due diligence and related directors' legal issues is still lacking. To solve this problem with the purpose of a certain level of research. The second chapter introduces the origin and legal classification of the concept of due diligence, and the different legal status in Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and expounds the relevant legislation of our country. The fiduciary obligation is the basis of all the legal obligations of the directors in the process of due diligence, and the obligation to inform is the important embodiment of the fiduciary obligation. It is a vane for directors to fulfill their fiduciary obligations. This chapter discusses the legal obligations of directors in due diligence, and expounds the theoretical basis and main contents of directors' fiduciary obligations. At the same time, it also points out the deficiency and deficiency of our company law system in this respect. Chapter 4th the standards of directors' duties and legal responsibilities in due diligence of equity investment. This chapter consists of two sections. The first section deals with how the directors of a company, when conducting due diligence on equity investments, meet the standards of diligence and due diligence as agreed or promised to shareholders, The second section discusses the legal liability of directors in due diligence of equity investment from two angles. Expound. Compare the legislation of our country with that of foreign countries, By comparing the legal liability of directors to the company and the legal liability to the shareholders, the author expounds the principle of what kind of imputation should be used to identify the directors' liability, and adopts the comparison of legislation between China and other countries from many aspects and angles. The method of analysis is used to demonstrate.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】