隐名出资情况下债权人保护问题
本文选题:隐名出资 切入点:债权人保护 出处:《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:公司债权人的保护问题是公司法的一个重要的研究领域,随着公司法理论与公司法实践研究的不断深入,人们对债权人与股东、公司管理者等公司参与人之间的利益冲突与平衡关系有了更加深入的认识,对于公司债权人的利益保护确立了许多新的制度,如对于滥用股东权利的股东,债权人可以提出股东有限责任的例外适用,追究股东的责任。有限责任公司隐名出资在实践中引发了很多纠纷。我们应该怎样认定隐名出资,如何厘清隐名出资的内外法律关系,是一个值得思考的问题。关于隐名出资的司法解释刚刚出台,本文在隐名出资基本理论研究的基础上,通过对隐名出资情况下债权人保护的理论与立法现状进行评析,并对债权人保护的问题进行探讨。 本文共分为四个部分。第一部分是关于隐名出资与债权人保护的概述。论述了本文的隐名出资的概念,阐述了其法律特征,分析隐名出资的成因,并且根据不同的原因将隐名出资划分为不同的类型。然后阐释了隐名出资与债权人保护之间的联系,着重分析的是隐名出资可能对债权人利益产生的不利影响。 第二部分是关于隐名出资法律关系的分析,本文将隐名出资的法律关系分为内部法律关系与外部法律关系,并对其学说进行介绍与评析,提出对内部法律关系应当采用信托说。通过对外部法律关系的分析,认为隐名出资人有对公司债权人承担无限责任的连带责任的可能性。 第三部分是关于隐名出资情况下债权人保护的立法现状的论述,并对相关内容进行评析。这部分提出了新的司法解释对于公司债权人保护的不足之处,主要在于对隐名出资人是否承担无限责任连带责任的规定不够明晰。 第四部分是对债权人保护机制的补充与完善。我国应当在公司法中完善关于隐名出资情况下对债权人的保护问题,以弥补这方面的法律空白。具体的措施是在严格的条件限制下适用公司法人格否认制度来维护公司债权人的利益,对隐藏在公司和显名股东之后的侵害债权人利益的隐名出资人进行直索。另外,还必须注意对我国的司法解释的补充,对未尽的规定继续进行探索,并论证其可行性,为充分保障债权人利益,平衡股东与债权人利益作出不懈努力。
[Abstract]:The protection of corporate creditors is an important research field in the company law. With the deepening of the theory and practice of company law, people pay more attention to creditors and shareholders. There is a deeper understanding of the conflict of interest and balance between company participants, such as corporate managers, and many new systems have been established for the protection of the interests of corporate creditors, such as shareholders who abuse their shareholders' rights. Creditors can make exceptions to shareholders' limited liability and investigate shareholders' liability. Anonymous contributions of limited liability companies have caused a lot of disputes in practice. How should we identify anonymous contributions? It is worth thinking about how to clarify the internal and external legal relationship of anonymous capital contribution. This paper analyzes the theory and legislation of creditor's protection under the condition of anonymous capital contribution, and probes into the problem of creditor's protection. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of anonymous capital contribution and creditor protection. It discusses the concept of anonymous capital contribution, expounds its legal characteristics, and analyzes the causes of anonymous capital contribution. And according to the different reasons will be classified into different types of anonymous capital contribution, and then explained the relationship between anonymous capital contribution and creditor protection, focusing on the hidden capital contribution may have a negative impact on the interests of creditors. The second part is about the analysis of the legal relationship of anonymous capital contribution, this paper divides the legal relationship of anonymous capital contribution into internal legal relationship and external legal relationship, and introduces and comments on its theory. Through the analysis of the external legal relationship, the author thinks that the anonymous investor has the possibility of joint and several liability to the creditors of the company. The third part is about the legislation status quo of creditor protection under the condition of anonymous capital contribution, and analyzes the relevant contents. This part puts forward the deficiencies of the new judicial explanation for the protection of the creditors of the company. The main reason is that it is not clear whether the anonymous investor assumes unlimited liability joint and several liability. The fourth part is the supplement and perfection of creditor protection mechanism. In order to fill up the legal gaps in this respect. The specific measures are to apply the system of denial of corporate personality under strict conditions to protect the interests of the creditors of the company. In addition, we must pay attention to the supplement to the judicial interpretation of our country, continue to explore the outstanding provisions, and demonstrate its feasibility. In order to fully protect the interests of creditors, balance the interests of shareholders and creditors to make unremitting efforts.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 沈四宝 ,王俊;试论英美法“刺破公司面纱”的法律原则[J];对外经济贸易大学学报;1992年04期
2 虞政平;股东资格的法律确认[J];法律适用;2003年08期
3 王成勇,陈广秀;隐名股东之资格认定若干问题探析[J];法律适用;2004年07期
4 刘俊海;;论有限责任公司股权转让合同的效力[J];法学家;2007年06期
5 周友苏;;试析股东资格认定中的若干法律问题[J];法学;2006年12期
6 石育斌;毛燕琼;;如何认定台商在大陆隐名投资的法律效力——以上海为例的探讨[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期
7 邹进文;古代中西商业合伙经营比较研究[J];商业经济与管理;1996年02期
8 刘惠明;日本公司法上的法人人格否认法理及其应用[J];环球法律评论;2004年01期
9 陈红;探析公司隐名投资的现状与规范[J];政治与法律;2003年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 刘敏;[N];人民法院报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 田原;试论有限责任公司中的隐名投资问题[D];华东政法学院;2006年
2 应朝阳;试析有限责任公司隐名股东的权利和义务[D];复旦大学;2008年
3 徐振华;隐名出资法律问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2009年
4 吕磊;隐名持股若干法律问题研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
5 潘永锋;有限责任公司隐名出资主体法律关系研究[D];兰州大学;2010年
,本文编号:1650092
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1650092.html