当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

股东派生诉讼滥诉的预防机制研究

发布时间:2018-03-25 03:29

  本文选题:股东派生诉讼 切入点:滥诉 出处:《青岛大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国新公司法引入股东派生诉讼制度后,由于法律规定的不完善,各项配套制度的不健全,导致司法实践中出现了滥用派生诉权的现象。为了更好的发挥股东派生诉讼制度在保护中小股东利益方面的作用,需要在诉讼前、诉讼中、诉讼后的整个诉讼阶段采取预防措施,从制度设计上对滥诉行为进行规制。本文拟用三个部分对这一问题进行探讨。 第一部分,股东派生诉讼滥诉的产生和表现形式。通过对股东派生诉讼滥诉的产生和表现形式的研究,揭示当前我国股东派生诉讼制度存在的漏洞和缺陷。 第二部分,预防股东派生诉讼滥诉的必要性。从股东派生诉讼制度缺陷、维护公司利益需要以及完善立法需要三个方面表明预防股东派生诉讼滥诉的必要性和紧迫性。 第三部分,预防股东派生诉讼滥诉的措施。这一部分是文章的重点,主要分为三个小部分。首先是起诉前预防股东派生诉讼滥诉的措施,包括限定原告资格,限定被告范围,设置前置程序。其次是诉讼中预防股东派生诉讼滥诉的措施,包括诉讼担保、诉讼费用的计算标准、控制和解程序和诉讼驳回制度。最后是诉讼终结时预防股东派生诉讼滥诉的措施,主要指原告胜诉、败诉时股东的责任承担。整个措施部分都包括了各国立法和学术界的主要观点以及我国学者对此问题的争议和讨论,以期在此基础上提出自己的更为合理的主张,从而完善我国的股东派生诉讼制度,使其发挥应有的积极作用。
[Abstract]:After the introduction of the shareholder derivative litigation system into the new company law of our country, due to the imperfection of the legal provisions and the imperfect supporting systems, In order to give full play to the role of shareholder derivative litigation system in protecting the interests of minority shareholders, it is necessary to take action before litigation. In the whole litigation stage after litigation, preventive measures are taken to regulate the excessive action from the system design. This article intends to use three parts to discuss this problem. The first part, the emergence and manifestation of shareholder derivative action, reveals the loopholes and defects of shareholder derivative action system in our country through the study of the origin and manifestation of shareholder derivative action. The second part, the necessity of preventing shareholder derivative litigation from the defects of shareholder derivative litigation system, the need to safeguard the interests of the company and the need to improve the legislation. The third part, the measures to prevent shareholder derivative actions from overlitigation. This part is the focus of the article, which is divided into three small parts. First, the measures to prevent shareholders from overappealing in derivative actions before prosecution, including limiting the qualification of the plaintiff and limiting the scope of the defendant, The next is the measures to prevent shareholder derivative actions from overlitigation, including the litigation guarantee, the standard of calculation of litigation costs, Finally, the measures to prevent shareholder derivative actions from overappealing at the end of the proceedings, mainly referring to the plaintiff's victory, The whole measure includes the main viewpoints of various countries' legislation and academic circles, as well as the dispute and discussion of Chinese scholars on this issue, in order to put forward their own more reasonable claims on the basis of this. In order to perfect the shareholder derivative litigation system, make it play its due positive role.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 胡晓静;;德国股东派生诉讼制度评析[J];当代法学;2007年02期

2 焦津洪;;论对持少数股份股东的法律保护[J];国际商务.对外经济贸易大学学报;1995年05期

3 王欣新,徐阳光;论我国股东代表诉讼制度的构建[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2004年03期

4 蔡立东,刘美芳;派生诉讼原告资格论[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期

5 董艳;;论防止诉讼权利滥用机制的构建[J];淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年06期

6 徐纯生;国外股东代表诉讼中的制衡机制及诉讼结果归属研究[J];湖湘论坛;2005年04期

7 董潇丽;李鹏;;试论我国股东诉讼制度之完善[J];经济师;2006年01期

8 张军亮;王燕;;股东派生诉讼之适用限制[J];牡丹江大学学报;2009年08期

9 周剑龙;;日本公司法制现代化中的股东代表诉讼制度[J];南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版);2006年03期

10 周玲;李艳华;;浅析我国的股东派生诉讼制度[J];企业家天地下半月刊(理论版);2009年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 夏玲丽;论股东派生诉讼制度的构建[D];郑州大学;2007年

2 李玲;论股东代表诉讼滥诉的防止[D];华东政法大学;2007年

3 刘占中;股东代表诉讼的原告制度研究[D];清华大学;2007年

4 李海波;论股东派生诉讼的约束机制[D];西南政法大学;2008年

5 朱立龙;论我国股东派生诉讼制度的构建[D];苏州大学;2008年

6 李睿;防范股东派生诉讼滥用的理性分析与制度设计[D];西北大学;2009年



本文编号:1661366

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1661366.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3e80b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com