异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-31 04:31

本文选题：异议股东股份回购请求权　切入点：适用情形　出处：《南京大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：异议股东股份回购请求权滥觞于美国法和英国法中的判例制度,其产生的两个不同渊源决定了该项制度的适用情形包含有公司重大变化和不公平损害两种类型。同时,异议股东股份回购请求权矫正资本多数决异化和保护少数股东利益的制度价值要求其适用情形应当涵盖资本多数决异化的两种表现形式。但异议股东股份回购制度与公司资本制度和公司治理制度之间的冲突又决定了该制度的适用情形必须受到相应的限制。依照异议股东股份回购请求权的制度价值检视,自我国《公司法》2005年正式引入异议股东股份回购请求权制度以来,该制度在便利少数股东退出公司,维护少数股东利益方面发挥了重要作用。但受适用情形的制约,异议股东股份回购请求权的适用范围受到了极大限制,其制度价值在司法实践中无法得到充分发挥。针对我国异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形存在的问题,《公司法》应当进行有效回应,对现有适用情形进行完善并适当扩展异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形。兜底条款是扩展异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形的有效立法手段,但应当明确异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形确定标准才能准确适用异议股东股份回购请求权,充分实现其制度价值。全文共分为引言、正文、结语三个部分。引言部分通过一个案例引出我国异议股东回购请求权适用情形存在的问题,继而对学界的研究成果进行梳理,明确全文的分析思路。针对异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形问题,文章正文分四章展开讨论：第一章主要对异议股东股份回购请求权的渊源以及其与适用情形之间的关系进行研究,分析了异议股东股份回购请求权的渊源对于适用情形的影响；第二章主要论述了异议股东股份回购请求权的制度价值以及其与异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形的关系,指出依照制度价值的要求异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形应涵盖资本多数决异化的两种表现形式。但是,异议股东股份回购请求权制度与公司资本制度和公司治理制度之间的冲突和矛盾又决定了其适用情形必须受到一定的限制；第三章结合司法实践对我国的异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形进行检讨和反思,提出应在修正现有适用情形规定的基础上结合司法实践增加新的适用情形,并将“其他股东会决议不公平损害少数股东利益”作为异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形的兜底条款；第四章针对第三章所提出的“其他股东会决议不公平损害少数股东利益”的兜底条款进行研究,明确异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形确定标准,便利于异议股东股份回购请求权的准确适用。全文遵循理论联系实际的原则,综合运用了价值分析和实证分析的研究方法,立足中国司法实践,解释论与立法论并重,结合异议股东股份回购请求权的制度价值论证了我国异议股东股份回购请求权适用情形存在的不足,提出了应对之策。
[Abstract]:The dispute between shareholder ' s share buyback system and corporate capital system and corporate governance system determines that the application of the system must be limited accordingly .

According to the system value view of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s shares , the system has played an important role in facilitating minority shareholders to withdraw from the company and safeguard the interests of minority shareholders .

This paper is divided into three parts : preface , text and conclusion . The introduction part draws a case out of the problems existing in the application of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s buyback , and then sorts out the research results in the academic field .
The second chapter mainly discusses the value of the system value of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s share buyback and its relationship with the application situation of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s share buyback , and points out that the application of the right to request the shareholder ' s share buyback according to the value of the system should cover the two forms of the split of capital . However , the conflict and contradiction between the system of request for repurchasing and the company ' s capital system and the corporate governance system decide that the application situation must be limited ;
In the third chapter , we review and reflect on the application of the application of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s share buyback in our country in combination with the judicial practice , and put forward that the new application situation should be added in combination with the judicial practice on the basis of the amendment of the existing application situation , and the " other shareholders ' meeting resolution does not harm the interests of minority shareholders " as the sole clause of the application of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s share repurchase request .
In the fourth chapter , according to the provisions of " other shareholders ' meeting resolution unfair harm to minority shareholder ' s interests " proposed in chapter 3 , it is clear that the application situation of shareholder ' s share buyback application condition determines the standard , which is convenient for the accurate application of the right to request the shareholder ' s share buyback claim .

Based on the principles of theory and practice , the paper synthetically applies the research methods of value analysis and empirical analysis , based on the judicial practice of China , explains the theory of interpretation and the theory of legislation , and demonstrates the deficiency of the application of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s share buyback in combination with the system value of the right to buy back the shareholder ' s share buyback , and puts forward the countermeasures .

【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【引证文献】