股东派生诉讼中公司的法律地位研究

发布时间：2018-03-31 06:15

本文选题：股东派生诉讼　切入点：公司　出处：《浙江大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国新《公司法》规定了股东派生诉讼制度,它在预防董事、经理等公司高级管理人员侵犯公司利益,促进公司治理结构完善,保护股东的利益,起着重大的作用。但是,公司法没有规定公司在股东派生中的法律地位,这不利于对公司利益的保护。因此,笔者对这一问题进行研究,并提出个人意见。本文分为以下几个部分：第一部分主要介绍股东派生诉讼中公司的法律地位的认定存在一些现实问题。这些问题包括：法律规定的缺失,司法实践的不统一,理论界的巨大的争议。这些问题的根源就是法律对公司法律地位规定的缺失。第二部分主要介绍理论界关于公司法律地位的各种学说。这些学说本身都或多或少地存在某些问题,无法有效地解决公司的法律地位问题。第三部分主要介绍英美法系的英国和美国以及大陆法系的日本关于公司法律地位的不同的立法例。第四部分主要分析公司的诉讼参加问题,它是解决公司法律地位问题的前提。第五部分主要是对公司的法律地位作出定性,认定公司应当是股东派生诉讼的辅助第三人,并分析了公司参加股东派生诉讼的方式和在诉讼中的权利义务。最后部分,本文认为公司在股东派生中应当居于辅助第三人的法律地位,但是由于我国民事诉讼对辅助第三人没有作出固定,笔者建议在进行民事诉讼法修改时,应当对我国的第三人制度进行修改,增加辅助第三人的法律规定。而在当下的司法实践中,将公司作为无独立请求权的第三人,或许是最好的选择。总之,明确公司在股东派生诉讼中的法律地位,对完善公司治理结构,保护中小股东利益和公司利益有着重要的意义。
[Abstract]:China's new "Company Law > provisions of shareholder derivative litigation system, which in the prevention of directors, managers and other senior management personnel infringe upon the interests of the company, improve the corporate governance structure, to protect the interests of shareholders, plays a significant role. However, the company law does not stipulate the legal status of the company in the shareholder derivative, which is not conducive to to protect the interests of the company. Therefore, the author studied the problems, and put forward personal views.
This article is divided into the following parts:
The legal status of that company, the first part mainly introduces the shareholder derivative action in the presence of some practical problems. These problems include: lack of legal provisions, judicial practice is not uniform, the theory circles great controversy. The root of these problems is the lack of legal provisions on the legal status of the company. The second part mainly introduces the various theories about the legal status of the company. These theories themselves are more or less there are some problems, can not effectively solve the problem of the legal status of the company. The third part mainly introduces the common law of England and the United States and Japan on the legal status of the company's own legislation. Part of the main analysis of the fourth companies in the proceedings, it is a prerequisite to solve the legal status of the company. The fifth part mainly defines the legal status of the company, the company shall be identified The shareholder derivative suit is the auxiliary third party, and analyzes the company's way to participate in the shareholder derivative action and the right and duty in the lawsuit.
In the last part, this paper argues that the company should be in the legal status of auxiliary third people in shareholder derivative, but because of China's civil litigation for third people do not have to make a fixed, the author recommends the amendment of civil procedural law, it should be third system for our country to revise the law, increase the auxiliary third people. In the current judicial practice, the company as the third party without independent claims, may be the best choice.
In a word, it is of great significance to clarify the legal status of the company in the shareholder derivative action, to improve the corporate governance structure, to protect the interests of small and medium shareholders and to the interests of the company.

【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】