论股东查阅权在公司法上的地位

发布时间：2018-05-01 23:19

本文选题：股东查阅权 + 股东知情权　；参考：《中国政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 作为股东知情权的一个重要组成部分,股东查阅权成为股东获取公司经营管理信息的重要途径,在股东知情权体系中居于基础性地位,为其它股东权利的行使提供信息支持。我国2005年修订后的《公司法》丰富了93年《公司法》对于股东查阅权的规定,但仍流于简单,导致实践中出现了权利保障不力和权利冲突缺乏规制的问题。本文以比较和实证的研究方法分析股东查阅权制度,目的在于对上述问题进行研究,为我国司法实践提供理论参考与支持。全文由引言、正文和结论三部分组成,正文主要分为四章进行论述: 第一章就股东查阅权立法现状进行考察,对我国股东查阅权制度和美国、英国、日本和德国股东查阅权制度分别予以介绍的基础上,比较分析出我国现有查阅权制度存在的不足之处,并点明我国实践中存在权利保障不力和权利冲突缺乏规制两个重要问题,提出本文研究的重点。第二章对股东查阅权在我国公司法股东权利体系中的地位进行了分析,并将其与知情权制度中其它相关制度进行了比较,分析得出股东查阅权在知情权制度体系中处于基础性地位,作为一项工具性权利为其它股东权利的行使提供信息支持,具有辅助作用。其后,分析了股东查阅权的性质。第三章针对股东查阅权权利保障不力问题,对股东查阅权的行使予以研究。就权利行使的范围、程序和保障三方面进行细致探讨,指出我国立法不足之处的同时对权利保障的完善提出建议。第四章针对权利冲突缺乏规制的问题,对股东权利行使的限制予以研究。首先分析了股东查阅权需受到限制的原因在于股东利益与公司利益存在冲突,为了利益平衡的需要需对股东权利的行使加以限制。其后,对权利行使的主客观两方面的具体限制条件——正当目的和持股比例和持股时间的限制予以阐述分析。最后,从事前防御和事后救济两个角度,对股东滥用权利的规制予以研究。最后一部分是本文的结论部分,笔者概括了本文论述的主要内容,并再次点明了本文的主要观点。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the shareholders' right to know, the shareholder's right to consult has become an important way for shareholders to obtain the management information of the company. It is in the basic position in the system of shareholders' right to know and provides information support for the exercise of other shareholders' rights. In 2005, the "public judicature", after the revision of China, enriched the company law for 93 years. The provisions of the right still flow in a simple way, which leads to the lack of rights protection and the lack of regulation in the conflict of rights. In this paper, a comparative and empirical study method is used to analyze the shareholder's right of inspection. The purpose of this paper is to study the above problems and provide theoretical reference and support for the judicial practice of our country.
The full text is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The main body is divided into four chapters:
In the first chapter, the current status of the shareholder's access right is examined. On the basis of the introduction of the system of the right to consult the shareholders of our country and the system of the right to consult the shareholders of the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan and the German shareholders, the shortcomings of the existing right system in our country are compared and analyzed, and the lack of protection of rights and the lack of conflict of rights exist in the practice of our country. Two important issues of regulation are put forward.
The second chapter analyzes the status of shareholder's right of consulting in the system of shareholders' rights in the company law of China, and compares it with other relevant systems in the right to know, and analyses that the shareholder's right of inspection is in a basic position in the system of the right to know. As a tool, it provides a letter for the exercise of other shareholders' rights. Interest support has a supporting role. Subsequently, the nature of shareholder's right to inspect is analyzed.
The third chapter, in view of the inability to guarantee the right to check the right of the shareholders, studies the exercise of the right to consult the shareholders, and makes a detailed discussion on the three aspects of the scope, procedure and guarantee of the exercise of rights, and points out the shortcomings of our country's legislation and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the protection of the rights.
The fourth chapter, in view of the lack of regulation of the conflict of rights, studies the limitation of the exercise of shareholders' rights. First, the reason for the limitation of the right to consult the shareholders lies in the conflict between the interests of shareholders and the interests of the company. In order to balance the interests of the shareholders, the exercise of shareholders' rights should be restricted. After that, the subjective and objective views of the exercise of the rights are two parties. The specific restriction conditions - the proper purpose, the proportion of shareholding and the limit of the holding time are expounded and analyzed. At the end of this paper, the regulation of the rights of the shareholders to be abused by the shareholders is studied in two angles.
The last part is the conclusion of this article. The author summarizes the main contents of this article, and points out the main points of this article again.

【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【引证文献】