股东请求解散公司制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 00:22

本文选题：公司法 + 公司僵局　；参考：《郑州大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 公司作为股东间契约自由的产物,其成立或解散应取决于股东的意志。当股东的权益被侵犯,公司又不能就恢复股东权益或解散公司达成一致时,权益受到侵害的股东应当有权通过各种途径来维护自身权益,而请求法院解散公司应当是其中最彻底的一种。股东请求解散公司是现代公司法对股东权利救济的一项重要制度。这一制度首先确立于美英国家的判例法,后被德、法、日、韩等大陆法系国家引进,至今已有150余年的历史,并成为股东权利保护体系中不可或缺的一个组成部分。我国2005年《公司法》在第183条对股东请求解散公司进行了规定,标志着股东请求解散公司制度在我国正式确立,从此,受压迫的股东可以名正言顺的通过请求法院解散公司来实现对自己权利的救济,人民法院也可以摆脱处理股东诉请解散公司案件无法可依的窘境,体现了公司法对公司僵局出现后利益受损股东的关怀。但是,该条规定过于简单笼统,可操作牲较差,很难体现司法救济的及时性与有效性。为解决司法实践中存在的困惑,最高人民法院在2008年作出了《关于适用中华人民共和国公司法若干问题的规定(二)》,该解释对股东请求解散公司的有关问题给予了明确。尽管如此,在司法实践中仍然存在较多的问题。为此,有必要对股东请求解散公司的制度进行系统研究和完善,以更好的服务于我国的司法实践。
[Abstract]:As a product of the freedom of contract between shareholders, the formation or dissolution of a company should depend on the will of the shareholders. When shareholders' rights and interests are infringed and the company is unable to reach agreement on restoring shareholders' rights or dissolving the company, shareholders whose rights and interests are infringed shall have the right to safeguard their own rights and interests through various means. And asking the court to dissolve the company should be one of the most thorough. Shareholder's request to dissolve company is an important system of modern company law to remedy shareholders' rights. This system was first established in the case law of the United States and the United Kingdom, and later introduced by Germany, France, Japan, Korea and other civil law countries. It has a history of more than 150 years and has become an indispensable part of the system of protecting shareholders' rights. In 2005, the Company Law of our country stipulated the shareholders' request for dissolution of the company in Article 183, which marked the formal establishment of the system of shareholders' request for dissolution of the company in our country. The oppressed shareholders can justifiably ask the court to dissolve the company to realize the relief of their rights, and the people's court can also get rid of the dilemma of handling the shareholder's petition to dissolve the company. It reflects the concern of the company law to the shareholders whose interests are damaged after the deadlock of the company. However, the provision is too simple and general, poor operable, it is difficult to reflect the timeliness and effectiveness of judicial relief. In order to solve the confusion in judicial practice, in 2008, the Supreme people's Court made "on the application of the people's Republic of China Company Law" provisions (2), this interpretation of shareholders' request to dissolve the company to give a clear question. However, there are still many problems in judicial practice. Therefore, it is necessary to study and perfect the system of shareholders' request to dissolve the company, so as to better serve the judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】