公司治理层面的职工参与法律制度研究
发布时间:2018-05-13 08:30
本文选题:公司治理 + 职工参与 ; 参考:《贵州民族学院》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:公司治理是适应现代企业的所有权与控制权分离后解决代理权问题而设置的一种制度。良好的公司治理结构对一个公司做大做强、良性发展具有决定性的作用,这已是世界各国公认的事实。公司治理经历了从“股东本位”到“利益相关者”理论的转化,与传统的股东利益至上治理模式不同,利益相关者治理模式认为,企业不仅要对股东负责,而且要对与企业有经济利益关系的相关者负责。在利益相关者模式中,特别强调了企业职工的重要作用。在各国的实践中,由于不同的政治制度和历史传统,形成了不同的职工参与模式。代表性的有以工人委员会事实上扮演经理人角色的前南斯拉夫模式、由经理人控制公司决策的利害相关者模式和职工有限参与公司决策的欧陆共决模式。我国职工参与的立法从计划经济的职工主人翁模式到社会主义市场经济的公司制度中的职工参与董监事会,经历了不同的模式,至今不同的参与体制仍然存在,这导致了我国职工参与在企业内部结构体系中紊乱不统一的特征,因此就必须在现有基础上做出选择,找到一条符合我国国情而又适应市场经济特征的职工参与模式或路径。 作为社会主义国家,我国历来重视职工权利的保护,在历来的公司立法中都有有关职工参与的规定,尤其是2005年新《公司法》的出台,更加完善了职工参与制度的相关立法,加强了职工参与的法律保护。尽管如此,我国在职工参与法律制度上还存在很多问题,诸如职工代表大会形式化、工会不独立、职工董监事权限不明等问题。从职工大会、工会等公司制度层面,企业责任、企业伦理等非制度层面完善职工参与制度是行之有效的方法。本文就是在赞同利益相关者理论的公司治理理论的基础上,选取职工参与这一影响公司治理的因素来展开论述的。
[Abstract]:Corporate governance is a system that adapts to the separation of ownership and control of modern enterprises. Good corporate governance structure plays a decisive role in making a company bigger and stronger, which has been recognized as a fact all over the world. Corporate governance has gone through the transformation from "shareholder standard" to "stakeholder" theory, which is different from the traditional governance mode of shareholder interest supremacy. The stakeholder governance model holds that enterprises should not only be responsible to shareholders, but also to shareholders. And to be responsible for the business with the economic interests of the stakeholders. In the stakeholder model, the important role of the enterprise staff is especially emphasized. In the practice of various countries, different patterns of employee participation have been formed due to different political systems and historical traditions. Representative are the former Yugoslavia model in which the workers' committee in fact plays the role of manager, the stakeholder model in which the manager controls the decision-making of the company and the European common decision model in which the staff and workers participate in the decision-making of the company with limited participation. The legislation of employee participation in our country has gone from the mode of master ownership of planned economy to the participation of workers in the company system of socialist market economy in the board of directors, and has gone through different modes. Up to now, different systems of participation still exist. This leads to the disordered and disunified characteristics of employee participation in the internal structure system of enterprises, so we must make a choice on the basis of the present situation, and find a mode or path of employee participation that conforms to the national conditions of our country and adapts to the characteristics of market economy. As a socialist country, our country has always attached importance to the protection of workers' rights. In the company legislation of the past, there are provisions on the participation of workers and staff, especially the introduction of the new Company Law in 2005, which has improved the relevant legislation on the system of employee participation. The legal protection of employee participation has been strengthened. However, there are still many problems in the legal system of employee participation in our country, such as the formalization of the staff Congress, the lack of independence of the trade union, and the unclear authority of the supervisor of the staff and workers. It is an effective method to perfect the employee participation system from the aspects of company system, corporate responsibility, enterprise ethics and so on. On the basis of the theory of corporate governance which agrees with the theory of stakeholders, this paper chooses the employee participation as a factor that affects corporate governance.
【学位授予单位】:贵州民族学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 项兵;管理腐败与公司治理[J];改革;1997年04期
2 石少侠,王福友;论公司职工参与权[J];法制与社会发展;1999年03期
3 罗培新;我国职工参与管理之立法缺漏及其完善[J];上海大学学报(社会科学版);2000年04期
4 李炳炎;唐思航;;略论创建中国特色社会主义现代企业制度[J];探索;2007年02期
5 郭站红;;论劳资和谐的公司法理念[J];环球法律评论;2008年03期
6 郑显华;对职工(代表)大会的法律思考[J];现代法学;1997年02期
,本文编号:1882417
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1882417.html