公司法第16条的规范意义

发布时间：2018-06-05 00:46

本文选题：公司法第条 + 公司担保　；参考：《法学研究》2011年06期

【摘要】：公司法第16条是争议较多的条款之一。理论和实务中围绕违反第16条提供的公司担保或投资的效力展开讨论,虽然观点不尽相同,但大多围绕第16条是否为强制性规定来论证各自的观点。这种解释有悖于第16条的立法目的。事实上,第16条并非旨在规范公司对外担保或投资的行为,而是规范公司内部关于担保或投资事项的意思决定程序。基于第16条的立法背景及其在公司法规范体系中的意义,违反第16条的直接后果是组织法上的相应责任,影响公司关于对外担保或投资事项的董事会或者股东(大)会决议的效力。即使公司对外担保或投资行为未经董事会或者股东(大)会决议,或者董事会或股东(大)会决议被撤销或者确认无效,在第三人善意的情况下,亦不影响公司对外担保或投资行为的效力。
[Abstract]:Article 16 of the Company Law is one of the most controversial provisions. In theory and practice, the validity of the company guarantee or investment in violation of article 16 is discussed. Although the views are different, most of them argue that whether article 16 is mandatory or not. This interpretation runs counter to the legislative purpose of article 16. In fact, article 16 is not intended to regulate the conduct of a company's external guarantee or investment, but to regulate the internal process of determining the meaning of security or investment matters. Based on the legislative background of Article 16 and its significance in the normative system of Company Law, the direct consequence of violating Article 16 is the corresponding responsibility in organic law. Affect the validity of decisions of the board of directors or shareholders (large) on matters of external guarantee or investment. Even if the company's foreign guarantee or investment act has not been resolved by the board of directors or the shareholders (large) meeting, or the resolution of the board of directors or shareholder (grand) meeting has been revoked or confirmed invalid, in the case of a third person's good faith, Nor does it affect the effectiveness of the company's foreign guarantee or investment.
【作者单位】：扬州大学法学院;
【基金】：江苏省哲学社会科学规划项目“公司法规范的解释学研究”(11FXB008)的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】