当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

公司法人人格否认诉讼制度之完善

发布时间:2018-06-08 16:11

  本文选题:公司法人人格否认诉讼 + 管辖 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2010年硕士论文


【摘要】: 新《公司法》第二十条对公司法人人格否认有了初步的规定,这表明公司法人人格否认问题进入了立法范围。随着现代公司制度的进一步发展,公司方面的立法需求也会进一步加大。实体方面的立法在进一步完善,程序立法也应当相应地予以加强。设立公司法人人格否认制度的目的是防止股东滥用公司独立人格和有限责任,损害债权人的合法利益。但是要真正维护债权人的债权,还得有相应的程序机制予以保障,如果当事人没有诉讼权利,那么也无法寻求到诉讼的保护,就无法采取诉讼的手段来维护自己的权益,所以公司法人人格否认诉讼问题有必要进行研究。解决公司纠纷的方式有许多,包括股东会决议、仲裁方式、行政方式等等,但是这些方式都不能适用于否认公司法人独立人格。因此,只有通过诉讼程序,由法院通过严格的审查程序对公司法人人格予以认定,才能保证公司法人人格否认制度不被滥用,也及时保护债权人的受损利益,进而维护公司发展的正常秩序。公司法人人格否认诉讼是属于民事诉讼的一种,但其又不同于普通的民事诉讼,具有其自身的特点,即诉讼主体的特定性、诉讼理由的特殊性、判决效力的个别性,所以应对其具体的程序问题进行具体的分析,把公司法人人格否认的特殊性体现在制度完善之中。完善我国公司法人人格否认诉讼制度,应以民事诉讼法的基本原则为基础,如当事人平等原则等等,部分制度也与民事诉讼法的规定一致,如审判制度、保全制度等。在以民事诉讼法为依据的前提下,某些程序问题应当具体分析,如管辖制度、当事人确定、举证责任等方面的问题,因为如果完全依据民事诉讼法的规定,则不具备可操作性,会使双方当事人的权利出现不公平的现象。只有具体问题具体分析,才能达到更好的诉讼效果,彻底地解决纠纷。本文第二章到第四章已经对这三方面进行了详细的分析,这是完善我国公司法人人格否认诉讼制度应当注意到的问题。
[Abstract]:Article 20 of the new Company Law has a preliminary regulation on the denial of corporate personality, which indicates that the denial of corporate personality has entered the scope of legislation. With the further development of modern corporate system, the legislative needs of the company will be further increased. The substantive legislation is further improved, and the procedural legislation should be strengthened accordingly. The purpose of establishing the denial system of corporate personality is to prevent shareholders from abusing the independent personality and limited liability of the company and to harm the legitimate interests of creditors. However, in order to truly safeguard creditors' claims, they must also have corresponding procedural mechanisms to protect them. If the parties do not have litigation rights, then they cannot seek the protection of litigation, so they cannot take the means of litigation to safeguard their own rights and interests. Therefore, it is necessary to study the problem of corporate personality denial litigation. There are many ways to resolve company disputes, including shareholders' meeting resolution, arbitration, administrative methods and so on, but these methods can not be applied to deny the independent personality of the company legal person. Therefore, only through legal proceedings, the court through strict examination procedures to determine the corporate personality, in order to ensure that the corporate personality denial system is not abused, but also timely protection of the interests of creditors. Then maintain the normal order of the development of the company. The disavowal action of corporate personality is a kind of civil action, but it is different from ordinary civil action and has its own characteristics, that is, the particularity of litigation subject, the particularity of litigation reason, and the individuality of judgment effect. So we should make a concrete analysis of the specific procedural issues and embody the particularity of the denial of corporate personality in the perfection of the system. To perfect the system of disavowal litigation of corporate personality in our country, we should base on the basic principles of civil procedure law, such as the principle of equality of parties and so on. Some systems are also consistent with the provisions of civil procedure law, such as trial system, preservation system and so on. On the premise of taking the Civil procedure Law as the basis, some procedural issues should be specifically analyzed, such as the jurisdiction system, the determination of the parties, the burden of proof, and so on, because if the provisions of the Civil procedure Law are completely based, they will not be operable. It will make the rights of both parties unfair. Only concrete analysis can achieve better litigation effect and resolve disputes thoroughly. The second to fourth chapters of this paper have carried on the detailed analysis to these three aspects, this is the question which the consummation our country company legal person personality denial lawsuit system should pay attention to.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 季卫东;程序比较论[J];比较法研究;1993年01期

2 郭载宇;公司法人格否认法理的归责问题浅论[J];当代法学;1999年05期

3 李建国,莆继山;浅谈经济审判中公司人格否认原则的适用[J];当代法学;2000年05期

4 石少侠;;公司人格否认制度的司法适用[J];当代法学;2006年05期

5 李继;;法人人格否认之诉涉诉主体的合理定位[J];法制与社会;2008年07期

6 王军武;公司法人人格否认制度中的程序和法律适用设计[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期

7 李龙;民事诉讼当事人适格刍论[J];现代法学;2000年04期

8 金剑锋;公司人格否认理论及其在我国的实践[J];中国法学;2005年02期

9 陈信勇,董忠波;公司法人人格否认制度诉讼问题研究[J];浙江工商大学学报;2005年04期



本文编号:1996394

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1996394.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d78eb***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com