谈公司司法解散的现行规定及存在不足

发布时间：2018-06-25 07:44

本文选题：司法解散 + 经营管理　；参考：《商业时代》2009年20期

【摘要】：现行《公司法》第183条正式确立了我国公司的司法解散制度。随后2008年5月最高人民法院审判委员会第1447次会议通过了《关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的规定(二)》(下文称公司法规定二),进一步细化了审理公司解散案件的规定,主要包括公司司法解散的事由及提起解散之诉的程序等问题。目前尚未出台的《关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的规定(三)(征求意见稿)》(下文称公司法规定三意见稿)也已经成形,在该规定中又再次对公司解散的具体法律适用问题进行了规定。虽然目前我国立法初步确立了公司司法解散制度,但如何在司法实践中适用却处在不断探索和细化过程中。本文将就公司司法解散制度的一些具体问题结合国外相关立法经验进行探讨。
[Abstract]:Article 183 of the present Company Law formally establishes the judicial dissolution system of Chinese companies. Subsequently, at its 1447 meeting in May 2008, the Supreme people's Court Judicial Committee adopted the provisions on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (II) (hereinafter referred to as Company Law Regulation II), further refining the trial. Provisions on cases of dissolution of the Company, Mainly including the judicial dissolution of the company and the proceedings of the dissolution of the proceedings. The provisions on the application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (3) (draft for solicitation of opinions) (hereinafter referred to as the third draft of the provisions of the Company Law), which have not yet been issued at present, have also taken shape. In this regulation, the specific legal application of the dissolution of the company is again stipulated. Although the system of judicial dissolution of companies has been initially established in our country's legislation, how to apply it in judicial practice is in the process of continuous exploration and refinement. This article will discuss some specific problems of the judicial dissolution system of the company combined with the relevant legislative experience of foreign countries.
【作者单位】：河北师范大学法政学院;石家庄学院;
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】