论无权处分与出卖他人之物——兼评《合同法》第51条与《买卖合同解释》第3条

发布时间：2017-12-27 20:14

本文关键词：论无权处分与出卖他人之物——兼评《合同法》第51条与《买卖合同解释》第3条　出处：《当代法学》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：认定无权处分关键在于处分人的处分权存在瑕疵,出卖他人之物属典型的无权处分。《合同法》第51条至少从字面上看违背了物权变动区分原则,但可通过民法解释学方法加以补正:无权处分所涉债权合同原则上有效。相对人恶意时,权利人有权主张无权处分所涉债权合同无效。《买卖合同解释》第3条乃《合同法》第51条的当然之意,其适用以出卖他人之物所涉合同有效为前提,应做如下理解:在出卖他人之物中,出卖人违反了《合同法》第150条规定的权利瑕疵担保义务;但根据《合同法》第151条的规定,出卖人仅在买受人善意之时才承担源于处分权缺陷这一权利瑕疵所引起的违约责任。
[Abstract]:The key to identifying the unauthorized disposition lies in the defects of the disposition right of the dispose of the person, and the object of selling others is a typical unauthorized disposition. The fifty-first clause of the contract law, at least, violates the distinction principle of real right change, but it can be corrected through the hermeneutics of civil law. When the relative person maliciously, the right holder has the right to claim that the creditor's right contract involving the unauthorized disposition is invalid. Third "contract interpretation" is the "contract law" article fifty-first of Italy, the applicable to the sale of property of others involved in the contract effective premise, should be understood as follows: in the sale of property of others, the seller in violation of the "contract law" provisions of article 150th of the warranty obligations; but according to the "contract law" article 151st, the buyer the seller only in good faith when they take the source caused by disposition flaw in the right defects liability for breach of contract.
【分类号】：D923.6
【正文快照】： 无权处分是民法上非常复杂又非常重要的问题,其涉及到合同效力、物权变动等诸多民事基础理论〔1〕,“我国合同法于第51条规定无权处分后,备受争议。”〔2〕《物权法》第15条对物权变动区分原则的确立,尤其是最高人民法院《买卖合同解释》〔3〕的施行,对理论界与实务界关于无权

【相似文献】