《中华人民共和国合同法》第378条之理解与完善——兼论我国货币保管合同的民商分立

发布时间：2018-01-21 16:26

本文关键词： 货币保管合同混藏保管消费保管民事保管商事保管合同法替代物立法模式中华人民共和国　出处：《法商研究》2010年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：民法学界对《中华人民共和国合同法》第378条的规定普遍存在误解。该条规定所针对的并非货币的消费保管,最多只能是混藏保管。这种立法模式存在诸多缺陷。我国合同立法应区别对待货币的民事保管与商事保管。对于民事保管,应以当事人的意思自治为原则,即依合同约定来判断货币保管是否为消费保管;在此基础上适当兼顾保管效率,依合同的约定判断是否为混藏保管。对于商事保管,除对银行业金融机构的货币保管以促进货币融通为立法目的外,其他营业中产生的货币保管应以货币财产之安全为最高价值目标,规定此类货币保管为混藏保管,保管人不可使用其所保管货币,但可就替代物负返还义务。
[Abstract]:There is a general misunderstanding in the civil law community about the provisions of Article 378 of the contract Law of the people's Republic of China, which is not aimed at the consumer custody of money. At most, it can only be mixed storage. There are many defects in this legislative model. Our contract legislation should treat the civil and commercial custody of currency differently. For civil custody, the autonomy of the parties should be taken as the principle. That is, according to the contract to determine whether money custody is consumer custody; On this basis, the proper consideration of custody efficiency, according to the agreement of the contract to determine whether the custody of mixed storage. For commercial custody, in addition to the banking financial institutions to promote monetary custody for the purpose of legislation. The safekeeping of money arising from other business should take the safety of monetary property as the highest value goal, and stipulate that the custody of this kind of money is mixed storage. The custodian may not use the currency in his custody, but may bear the obligation to return the substitute.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6
【正文快照】： 货币本质上为一般等价物,充当着价值尺度、流通手段、支付手段及贮藏手段的基本职能,更是商品社会必要劳动时间的衡量标准及外在体现。这种经济特质决定了货币与其他物品有着根本差别,因此法律应当区别对待之。考察《中华人民共和国合同法》(以下简称《合同法》)对货币保管合

【相似文献】