专利联盟反垄断法规制研究

发布时间：2018-03-20 08:32

本文选题：专利联盟　切入点：反垄断法　出处：《中南民族大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：专利联盟是市场对“专利丛林”现象的回应，具有减轻许可费叠加问题、减少侵权诉讼风险及成本、清除阻碍专利等积极意义，但其也可能在相关市场上产生非法限制竞争的结果。专利权人在专利权行使过程中，，如果违背了专利权创制的社会目的或精神，不正当地损害了或可能损害他人利益或社会公共利益，就构成专利权的滥用，当这一滥用行为超越专利权对竞争限制的合理界限构成非法垄断时，为平衡专利权、保护和维持自由竞争，反垄断法就有对此进行规制的必要。就专利联盟反垄断法律规制而言，我国《反垄断法》的规定较为抽象、概括。而我国《合同法》、《对外贸易法》、《技术进出口管理条例》虽就技术许可或转让中许可人实施的一些类型的限制性行为进行了列举性的规定，但一方面，这些法律法规自身存有缺陷，彼此之间也未能较好地协调。因而从整体上看，我国规制专利联盟方面的反垄断立法还不够完善，不能很好适应反垄断法规制专利联盟垄断行为的需要。而在专利联盟反垄断规制方面，美国和欧盟不仅有丰富的司法实践经验和理论研究成果，还有较为完善的反垄断立法。就反垄断立法而言，在基本的反垄断法之外，美国和欧盟反垄断机构还颁发了反垄断法适用于专利权许可的指南或条例。实践正面，这一立法模式较好地解决了抽象的反垄断法如何适用于具体的专利联盟许可问题。鉴于我国目前反垄断立法的不足，为更好地发挥反垄断法对专利联盟的规制，我国也应借鉴美国和欧盟的立法模式，确定反垄断审查标准，以保证我国国内市场上的自由竞争秩序。
[Abstract]:Patent alliance is the response of the market to the phenomenon of "patent jungle", which has the positive significance of reducing the problem of superposition of license fees, reducing the risk and cost of tort litigation, and eliminating the obstruction of patent. However, it may also result in the illegal restriction of competition in the relevant market. If the patentee, in the course of the exercise of the patent right, violates the social purpose or spirit of the patent right creation, An abuse of a patent that unjustly damages or is likely to harm the interests of others or the public interest of society constitutes an abuse of the patent right, when such abuse exceeds the reasonable limits of the patent right and constitutes an illegal monopoly on the limits of competition, for the purpose of balancing the patent right, To protect and maintain free competition, anti-monopoly law is necessary to regulate it. As far as the antimonopoly law of patent alliance is concerned, the provisions of our country's Anti-monopoly Law are abstract. Generally speaking, China's contract Law, the Foreign Trade Law and the regulations on the Administration of the Import and Export of Technology provide for the enumeration of some types of restrictive acts carried out by licensees in the process of technology licensing or transfer, but on the one hand, These laws and regulations have their own defects, and they are not well coordinated with each other. Therefore, from the overall point of view, the anti-monopoly legislation in regulating patent alliances in China is not perfect enough. It can not meet the need of anti-monopoly law to regulate monopoly behavior of patent alliance. In the aspect of anti-monopoly regulation of patent alliance, the United States and the European Union not only have rich judicial practice experience and theoretical research results, but also have relatively perfect antitrust legislation. Antitrust agencies in the United States and the European Union have also issued guidelines or regulations that antitrust laws apply to patent licensing. This legislative model has solved the problem of how the abstract antimonopoly law can be applied to the licensing of patent alliance. In view of the deficiency of our country's current antimonopoly legislation, in order to bring the regulation of patent alliance into full play, China should also draw lessons from the legislative model of the United States and the European Union and determine the standards of antitrust examination in order to ensure the free competition order in our domestic market.
【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D912.29;D913

【参考文献】