德国缔约过失责任的成文化

发布时间：2018-04-14 10:05

本文选题：缔约过失责任 + 事务管理人责任　；参考：《清华法学》2010年02期

【摘要】：缔约过失责任在德国法上是一个通过学说和判例逐渐确立和完善起来的制度。自创设以来其在德国民法上的应用范围逐渐扩大。在修正后的德国债法中,缔约过失责任已被明确规定为第311条第2款。不过德国新债法对缔约过失责任的规定只是一种对过去已被接受的判例和通说的总结,并没有根本性的创新。而且德国学者对缔约过失责任是否保护缔约外的第三人存在分歧。与德国新债法的规定相比,我国《合同法》在缔约过失责任类型的设计上更为具体,并且未扩张至第三人,但也需要经由司法和学理解释得到阐明和发展,德国的经验对此提供了一个很好的参照系。
[Abstract]:Liability for fault in contracting is a system established and perfected in German law through doctrine and jurisprudence.Since its creation, its scope of application in German civil law has gradually expanded.In the amended German debt law, liability for fault in contracting has been expressly defined as Article 311, paragraph 2.However, Germany's new debt law on the liability for fault in treaties is only a summary of accepted jurisprudence and general theory in the past, and there is no fundamental innovation.Moreover, German scholars have different views on whether the liability for fault in contracting should protect the third party outside the treaty.Compared with the German new debt law, China's contract Law is more specific in the design of the type of fault liability in contracting, and has not expanded to a third party, but it also needs to be clarified and developed through judicial and theoretical interpretation.The German experience provides a good frame of reference for this.
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学法学院;
【分类号】：D951.6;DD913

【相似文献】