当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

无偿搭车人身损害赔偿探析

发布时间:2018-06-26 11:32

  本文选题:无偿搭车 + 人身损害 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着私家车的迅速发展,有车一族往往会在上下班路上免费顺带同事、邻居或者在节假日载上朋友一起出游。然而,一个法律问题却往往被人们忽视:一旦出了车祸,乘车者受到了人身伤害,损失由谁赔偿或补偿?司机或车主是否存在减免责任的法定事由,相关的赔偿或补偿该按照什么样的标准?我国对好意同乘侵权的责任认定在法律上尚属空白。 本文计划分三部分,通过对吴鸣诉程振魁、胡爱莲及西安泸河管委会人身损害赔偿一案的案例分析对好意同乘这一问题进行了论述: 第一章主要对“吴鸣诉程振魁、胡爱莲及西安泸河管委会人身损害赔偿一案”的案情进行了详细的介绍,对案件的事实,一、二审的开庭情况及判决结果进行了整理,并提出本案争议的焦点问题,力求让读者对本案的始末有个清晰的认识,为下面的分析论述做好铺垫。 第二章对本案具有争议性的问题进行论述,即本文的研究重点。主要从五方面进行分析: 第一方面,论述好意同乘的概念和特征; 第二方面,无偿搭车中搭车人与司机或车主之间是否存在运输合同关系,无偿搭车人是否有权依据《中华人民共和国合同法》第302条的规定基于客运合同向司机或车主主张人身损害赔偿; 第三方面,司机对同乘者是否构成侵权; 第四方面,司机或车主对无偿搭车人的人身损害承担责任的归责原则及承担责任和免责事由; 第五方面,讨论车辆所有人的责任。 第三章对于完善我国的无偿搭车人身损害赔偿制度的思考。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of private cars, car owners will often take their colleagues, neighbors or friends on holidays to and from work for free. However, a legal problem is often ignored: in the event of a car accident, the passenger suffered personal injury, who will compensate or compensate for the loss? Does the driver or owner have legal reasons for relief, and what are the criteria for compensation or compensation? The legal confirmation of our country's liability for the infringement of good will is still blank. This paper is divided into three parts, through the case analysis of Wu Ming v. Cheng Zhenkui, Hu Ailian and Xi'an Luhe River Administration Commission, the author discusses the problem of "good intention sharing": the first chapter mainly discusses "Wu Ming v. Cheng Zhenkui," Hu Ailian and the Xi'an Luhe Administrative Commission's personal injury compensation case were introduced in detail, the facts of the case, the first, the court session of the second trial and the result of the judgment were sorted out, and the focus of the dispute was raised. Make every effort to let the reader have a clear understanding of the beginning and end of the case, and pave the way for the following analysis and argumentation. The second chapter discusses the controversial issues in this case, that is, the focus of this paper. It is mainly analyzed from five aspects: first, the concept and characteristics of well-intentioned co-rider; second, whether there is a transportation contract relationship between the rider and the driver or the owner in the free ride. Whether the free rider has the right to claim compensation for personal injury to the driver or the owner on the basis of passenger transport contract in accordance with the provisions of Article 302 of the contract Law of the people's Republic of China; Fourth, the principle of imputation, liability and exemption of the driver or owner for the personal injury of the free rider; fifth, the liability of the owner of the vehicle. The third chapter is about how to perfect the compensation system of free rider personal injury in our country.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 胡玉鸿;利益衡量与“社会需求”——诉讼过程的动态分析之一[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2001年03期

2 刘晓蕊;;论风险自负对好意同乘中利益失衡的救济[J];法制与社会;2009年24期

3 吴国平;;好意同乘的法律性质浅析[J];法治研究;2009年09期

4 王长发;;好意同乘及其债法规制[J];法治研究;2010年11期

5 黄锡生,关慧;论好意施惠引发纠纷的处理[J];河北法学;2005年04期

6 乐科;道路交通事故好意同乘者损害赔偿问题探析[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2003年04期

7 张频波;陈绍峰;徐俊;;因“好意同乘”引发的侵权责任分析——以侵权法的归责原则为视角[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2008年05期

8 郭志文;;好意同乘法律责任研究[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2007年11期

9 王正苍;;论情谊行为及其法律后果[J];政法学刊;2006年06期

10 王娉娉;;好意同乘而致人损害之责任承担[J];中国审判;2009年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 谭显蓉;情谊行为研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年

2 方捷;顺风车问题法律探究[D];苏州大学;2008年



本文编号:2070250

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2070250.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户557cd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com