快递损害赔偿法律问题探析

发布时间：2018-07-01 17:56

本文选题：快递合同 + 损害赔偿　；参考：《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：快递服务属于特殊的物流服务,快递合同为真正第三人利益合同。快递收件人的损害赔偿在很多情况下会发生违约损害赔偿与侵权损害赔偿的竞合。司法实践中,对快递组织的违约责任应采无过错责任原则,对其侵权责任应采过错责任原则中的过错推定;明确快递收件人违约损害赔偿请求权的效力优先于寄件人;违约损害赔付范围包括快件寄递费用、再次购买或寄递该快递所花费的费用以及合同订立时快递服务组织应当预见的其他损失;明析有关保价条款、未保价限额赔偿条款的效力,以及限制性条款下有关快递损害赔偿的计算方法和赔付标准。在立法方面,我国应在《合同法》《侵权责任法》中增设相关条款,并颁行专门性部门规章,以解决法律对收件人损害赔偿保护不足的问题。
[Abstract]:Express delivery service is a special logistics service, express delivery contract for the real third party interest contract. In many cases, the damages of courier addressee will coincide with the damages of infringement. In judicial practice, the principle of no-fault liability should be adopted for the liability for breach of contract of express delivery organizations, and the presumption of fault in the principle of fault liability should be adopted for the tort liability of express delivery organizations, and the validity of the right of claim for damages for breach of contract of courier recipients should be given precedence over that of senders. The scope of damages for breach of contract includes courier charges, expenses incurred in buying or sending the courier again and other losses that the express delivery service should foresee at the time of conclusion of the contract; The validity of the uninsured limit compensation clause, and the calculation method and standard of damages for express delivery under the restrictive clause. In the aspect of legislation, our country should add relevant clauses in the Tort liability Law of contract Law, and issue special department regulations to solve the problem that the law does not protect the addressee's compensation for damages.
【作者单位】：中国海洋大学法政学院;
【基金】：山东省社科规划项目“预付费交易法律规制研究”(13CFXJ09)
【分类号】：D922.296;D923.6

【相似文献】