受欺诈合同的民法调整
发布时间：2018-11-12 13:24
【摘要】：民法对受欺诈合同调整的特定思路是：维护意思自治，以意思表示是否自由、真实为判断合同效力的标准；区分欺诈行为与受欺诈的民事行为，重在对受欺诈人损失的补偿。我国民法学界的传统观点认为，规定欺诈合同无效，有利于加强国家对合同关系的干预，惩罚欺诈人。但笔者认为，，规定欺诈合同为可撤销合同，更符合民法对受欺诈合同调整的特定思路。大陆法系民法对受欺诈合同的法律后果，区分相对人欺诈与第三人欺诈，分别作出规定，并对为第三人利益缔结的合同中的欺诈问题和可撤销制度适用的排除作出规定，均值得我国起草统一合同法时借鉴
[Abstract]:The special idea of civil law to adjust the fraudulent contract is to maintain the autonomy of the will, to express whether the will is free, and to judge the validity of the contract according to whether the will is free or not, to distinguish the fraudulent act from the fraudulent civil act, and to pay more attention to the compensation for the deceptive person's loss. The traditional view of the civil law circle in our country is that the stipulation of the invalidity of the fraudulent contract is conducive to strengthening the state's intervention in the contractual relationship and punishing the fraudster. However, the author thinks that the regulation of fraudulent contract as revocable contract is more in line with the specific idea of civil law. The civil law of the civil law system of civil law sets out separate provisions on the legal consequences of fraudulent contracts, which distinguish between fraud by counterpart and fraud by third parties, and on the issue of fraud in contracts concluded for the benefit of third parties and the exclusion of the application of the system of revocability. It is worthy of our country to draw lessons from the drafting of uniform contract law.
【作者单位】： 郑州大学法学院 郑州大学法学院
【分类号】：D923.64
[Abstract]:The special idea of civil law to adjust the fraudulent contract is to maintain the autonomy of the will, to express whether the will is free, and to judge the validity of the contract according to whether the will is free or not, to distinguish the fraudulent act from the fraudulent civil act, and to pay more attention to the compensation for the deceptive person's loss. The traditional view of the civil law circle in our country is that the stipulation of the invalidity of the fraudulent contract is conducive to strengthening the state's intervention in the contractual relationship and punishing the fraudster. However, the author thinks that the regulation of fraudulent contract as revocable contract is more in line with the specific idea of civil law. The civil law of the civil law system of civil law sets out separate provisions on the legal consequences of fraudulent contracts, which distinguish between fraud by counterpart and fraud by third parties, and on the issue of fraud in contracts concluded for the benefit of third parties and the exclusion of the application of the system of revocability. It is worthy of our country to draw lessons from the drafting of uniform contract law.
【作者单位】： 郑州大学法学院 郑州大学法学院
【分类号】：D923.64
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨代雄;;私权一般理论与民法典总则的体系构造——德国民法典总则的学理基础及其对我国的立法启示[J];法学研究;2007年01期
2 严励;刑事政策价值目标的追问[J];政法论坛;2003年05期
3 潘佳铭;法治概念的性质探析[J];西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2005年01期
4 毛
本文编号：2327246
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2327246.html
