当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

债权让与受让人利益保护研究

发布时间:2018-11-23 17:09
【摘要】:随着经济的发展,商业实践的扩张,经济主体对资金的需求越来越大。债权的顺利流转可以使其预期利益转变为现实价值,从而满足了债权人从事经济活动对资金的需求,,因而保障债权的顺利流转成为债权人的迫切要求。要保障债权的顺利流转,关键在于对受让人进行充分的保护。如果不能对受让人进行充分保护,受让人的安全地位难以得到有效保障,那么任何一个理性的潜在受让人不愿也不敢接受转让债权。我国债权让与制度起步较晚,对于受让人利益保护存有诸多缺陷,难以满足债权顺利流转的需要。因此如何完善我国债权让与中受让人利益保护,保障受让人在法律上的安全地位,实甚重要。 本文以保障受让人的安全地位为中心,分析了我国债权让与受让人利益保护的立法现状和缺陷,并在借鉴国外经验和结合我国实际的基础上,有针对性的提出完善我国受让人利益保护的立法建议。本文分为四章:第一章阐述了债权让与的概念和性质,债权让与制度的演进过程中受让人利益保护以及保护受让人利益的必要性。第二章分析了我国债权让与中受让人利益保护的立法现状和缺陷,共分为两节。第一节以我国《合同法》为基础,分析我国债权让与中受让人利益保护的立法现状;第二节着重剖析了受让人利益保护之立法缺陷:关于让与通知主体的规定不合理,完全肯定禁止债权让与特约效力和未确立债权让与的公示方式。第三章考察了英美法系和大陆法系关于受让人利益保护的立法状况,以期为我国完善受让人保护提供合理借鉴。第四章针对我国债权让与中受让人利益保护的立法缺陷,提出了增加受让人作为让与通知的主体,限制禁止让与债权特约对外效力和确立登记与通知相结合的债权让与公示方式的立法建议,以期切实加强受让人利益保护。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the expansion of commercial practice, the demand for capital is increasing. The smooth circulation of creditor's rights can make its expected interest turn into realistic value, thus satisfy the creditor's demand for funds in economic activities, thus ensuring the smooth circulation of creditor's rights becomes the urgent demand of creditors. To ensure the smooth flow of creditor's rights, the key lies in the full protection of the transferee. If the transferee can not be fully protected and the transferee's security status is difficult to be effectively protected, then any reasonable potential transferee is unwilling and dare not accept the assignment of creditor's rights. The system of assignment of creditor's rights in our country starts late, and there are many defects in the protection of transferee's interests, so it is difficult to meet the need of smooth circulation of creditor's rights. Therefore, it is very important to perfect the protection of the transferee's interests in the assignment of creditor's rights and to ensure the transferee's safe position in law. This paper focuses on the security status of the transferee, analyzes the present legislative situation and defects of the protection of the interest of the transferee of creditor's rights transfer in China, and on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign experience and combining with the reality of our country, To improve the protection of the interests of China's transferee legislative recommendations. This paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter expounds the concept and nature of the assignment of creditor's rights, the protection of the transferee's interests and the necessity of protecting the transferee's interests in the evolution of the system of assignment of creditor's rights. The second chapter analyzes the legislative status and defects of transferee interest protection in the assignment of creditor's rights in China, which is divided into two sections. The first section is based on the contract Law of China, and analyzes the legislative status of the protection of the transferee's interests in the assignment of creditor's rights in China. The second section focuses on analyzing the legislative defects of the transferee's interest protection: the stipulation on the subject of notice of assignment is unreasonable, the special effect of forbidding the assignment of creditor's rights and the way of publicizing the failure to establish the assignment of creditor's rights are completely affirmed. The third chapter investigates the legislation of transferee protection in Anglo-American law system and civil law system in order to provide reasonable reference for perfecting transferee protection in our country. In the fourth chapter, aiming at the legislative defects of the protection of the transferee's interest in the assignment of creditor's rights in our country, the author puts forward to increase the transferee as the subject of the notice of assignment. In order to strengthen the protection of the transferee's interests, it is proposed to restrict the external effect of the special contract of disclosing creditor's rights and to establish the way of making the assignment of creditor's rights public combined with registration and notification in order to strengthen the protection of transferee's interests.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 夏恒信,卢俊山,冯继华;论债权让与若干问题[J];山东审判;1998年05期

2 韩海光,崔建远;论债权让与和对抗要件[J];政治与法律;2003年06期

3 冯烨;;我国民法体系中债权二重让与的完善[J];山西广播电视大学学报;2007年02期

4 申建平;;债权双重让与优先权论[J];比较法研究;2007年03期

5 赵岩;;试论债权让与人权利瑕疵担保责任[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2008年11期

6 靳晨阳;国际保理初论──兼评新《合同法》的债权让与制度[J];法制与社会发展;1999年06期

7 孙婷婷;;论债权让与的效力问题[J];山东经济战略研究;2007年03期

8 赵岩;;债权让与通知若干法律问题探讨[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;2006年01期

9 王璐璐;;浅析债权让与通知[J];社会科学家;2007年S2期

10 申建平;债权让与通知论[J];求是学刊;2005年04期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 刘彤海;;“不良债权”受让人不能起诉银行吗——与梁慧星教授商榷[A];规划·规范·规则——第六届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2006年

2 李雯;;以转让方式转移拟证券化债权资产的相关法律问题探讨[A];2008全国博士生学术论坛(国际法)论文集——国际公法、国际私法分册[C];2008年

3 冯文丽;;财产保险合同转让的立法比较与启示——新《保险法》第49条修改的“属人主义”与“从物主义”之争[A];中国保险学会首届学术年会论文集[C];2009年

4 章博;;仲裁协议效力扩张理论视野下的提单仲裁条款转让[A];2008全国博士生学术论坛(国际法)论文集——国际公法、国际私法分册[C];2008年

5 曾晓梅;;论不动产善意取得的司法实践[A];中国民商法实务论坛论文集[C];2005年

6 王保树;;寻求规制营业的“根”与“本”[A];中国商法年刊(2007):和谐社会构建中的商法建设[C];2007年

7 余涛;郭丽;;商誉出资法律规制的初步研究[A];中国商法年刊第三卷(2003)[C];2003年

8 李有星;郭晓梅;;商事交易安全的反思——兼论“商事通则”的任务[A];中国商法年刊(2007):和谐社会构建中的商法建设[C];2007年

9 钱智;;不动产善意取得与无权处分[A];中国民商法实务论坛论文集[C];2005年

10 陈仕菊;;试论善意取得的构成要件——兼评我国《物权法》第106条的相关规定[A];当代法学论坛(二○一○年第1辑)[C];2010年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 钱利芳;债权让与了 受让人应该还债[N];江苏经济报;2006年

2 姜春玲;债权让与各方当事人利益平衡之我见[N];江苏法制报;2006年

3 付 英;司考全真分类精解(民法二)[N];人民法院报;2003年

4 朱大伦;债权让与应当由让与人通知债务人[N];人民法院报;2007年

5 记者 齐培松 通讯员 陈瑛;福建新设采矿权一律招拍挂[N];中国国土资源报;2006年

6 山东省临沂市中级人民法院 滕厚峰;起诉不是债权转让的通知方式[N];人民法院报;2006年

7 记者 夏s

本文编号:2352180


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2352180.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b56a9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com