是否足补与同补:农民工工伤补偿收入替代率及其地区差异研究——以一至四级因工伤残待遇一次性支付标准为例

发布时间：2018-01-02 14:37

本文关键词：是否足补与同补:农民工工伤补偿收入替代率及其地区差异研究——以一至四级因工伤残待遇一次性支付标准为例　出处：《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：按工伤保险两大功能即损失补偿与生活保障为讨论合理待遇的标准,取15岁、35岁、50岁3个伤残年龄点,计算并比较各省份农民工一至四级因工伤残一次性支付水平的劳动力工资损失替代率与生活保障水平替代率,以一级伤残为例,研究发现:16岁伤残年龄点,所有省份一次性支付都不能完全替代劳动力收入损失,63%的省份达不到低保水平;35岁伤残年龄点,所有省份一次性支付都不能完全替代劳动力收入损失,22%的省份达不到低保水平;50岁伤残年龄点,所有省份高于低保水平,仅26%的省份完全替代劳动力收入损失。这充分说明,我国农民工一至四级因工伤残待遇的一次性支付标准太低,难以有效保障工伤农民工的基本权益。
[Abstract]:According to the two major functions of industrial injury insurance compensation and life guarantee to discuss reasonable treatment standards, 15 years old, 35 years old, 50 years old 3 disability age spots, calculated and compared in the provinces of migrant workers to level Four one-time payment of disability caused by work-related injury level wage loss replacement rate and living guarantee level of substitution rate with a disability as an example, the study found that: 16 years old age disability, a one-time payment of all provinces can not completely replace the labor income loss, 63% provinces did not reach the subsistence level; 35 years old age disability, a one-time payment of all provinces can not completely replace the labor income loss, 22% provinces did not reach the subsistence level 50 years of age; disability, higher than the minimum level of all the provinces, only 26% provinces completely replace the labor income loss. This fully shows that China's migrant workers to level Four disability caused by work-related injury treatment of the one-time payment standard is too low, It is difficult to effectively protect the basic rights and interests of migrant workers.

【作者单位】：华东师范大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科青年基金项目“行为导向下的工伤保险预防之激励机制研究”(2012YJC840046)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.55
【正文快照】： 一引言职业伤害是与工业化相生的客观风险,其归责雇主后将带来补偿定价问题。非致死职业伤害减损劳动者劳动能力,补偿定价因此依据劳动能力减损程度以工资收入折算。劳动能力减损依据丧失时间与程度划分为暂时部分失能、暂时全部失能、永久部分失能和永久全部失能。永久失能后

【参考文献】