可撤销劳动合同的法理分析

发布时间：2018-01-30 14:27

本文关键词： 可撤销劳动合同劳动关系无效劳动合同实际履行　出处：《华东政法大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 劳动合同的效力是劳动合同的核心问题。我国劳动法中只确立了有效和无效两种效力类型,是否需要把可撤销劳动合同引入劳动法,一直是劳动法学界争议比较激烈的问题。在《劳动合同法》颁布之前,大多数学者认为可撤销劳动合同有利于软化我国劳动法中过于刚性的效力机制,更能体现当事人的意志,有利于保护劳动者的利益,主张将其引入我国劳动法。也有部分学者认为可撤销劳动合同与劳动关系的特殊性存在诸多不适应性,不宜引入。《劳动合同法》的立法过程对学界的争论也有所体现。立法者在立法之初引入了可撤销劳动合同。而在之后的立法过程中,立法者走向了相反的方向,抛弃了可撤销劳动合同,直至最后颁布的《劳动合同法》都没有再将其引入,而是采用了允许当事人解除因意思表示瑕疵而无效的劳动合同的手段对劳动合同的效力制度进行改进。总体来说立法者的这个思路是比较合理的,但是由于特殊的立法背景和立法过程的仓促,使其在具体条文设计上存在不足之处。本文通过分析劳动法的基本原则、劳动关系的特殊性,揭示可撤销劳动合同与劳动关系之间的矛盾,然后分析《劳动合同法》的相关规定,发现其对劳动合同效力改进的合理性,并提出完善的建议,以期引玉之效。本文分为三章,具体如下: 第一章为可撤销劳动合同的争鸣。该章对学界关于可撤销劳动合同的两种学说进行了梳理,介绍了立法过程中立法者对可撤销劳动合同态度的转变,并对立法者的思路进行了简要分析。第二章为可撤销劳动合同的理论分析。该章从可撤销劳动合同的概念入手,运用劳动法的基本原则和劳动关系的特殊性对可撤销劳动合同与劳动关系之间的矛盾进行了深入分析,并对两种学说进行了评析。第三章为对《劳动合同法》相关规定的完善。该章从对可撤销劳动合同的撤销权与劳动合同的单方解除权的界定入手,对《劳动合同法》相关规定的合理性进行了分析,然后指出现行规定的不足之处并提出完善的建议。
[Abstract]:The validity of labor contract is the core problem of labor contract. In our labor law, there are only two types of valid and invalid validity, whether it is necessary to introduce the revocable labor contract into the labor law. It has always been a controversial issue in the field of labor law. Before the promulgation of the Labor contract Law, most scholars think that the revocable labor contract is conducive to softening the excessive rigidity of the effective mechanism in the labor law of our country, and can more reflect the will of the parties. It is beneficial to the protection of the interests of the laborer and advocates the introduction of it into the labor law of our country. Some scholars also think that there are many inadaptability to the particularity of the revocable labor contract and the labor relation, which should not be introduced. The legislative process of "Labor contract Law" also reflects the debate in academic circles. The legislator introduced the revocable labor contract at the beginning of the legislation, but in the later legislative process, the legislator went in the opposite direction. Abandoned the revocable labor contract, until the final promulgation of the Labor contract Law has not been introduced. Instead, it adopts the method of allowing the parties to remove the invalid labor contract because of the defect of the intention to improve the effectiveness system of the labor contract. Generally speaking, this idea of the legislators is more reasonable. However, because of the special legislative background and the haste of the legislative process, there are some deficiencies in the design of the specific provisions. By analyzing the basic principles of labor law and the particularity of labor relations, this paper reveals the contradiction between revocable labor contract and labor relations, and then analyzes the relevant provisions of Labor contract Law. Find the rationality of the improvement of the effectiveness of labor contract, and put forward some suggestions, in order to lead to the effect of jade. This paper is divided into three chapters, the details are as follows: The first chapter is the controversy of revocable labor contract. This chapter combs the two theories about cancelable labor contract and introduces the change of legislator's attitude towards revocable labor contract in the legislative process. And the legislator's train of thought has carried on the brief analysis. The second chapter is the theoretical analysis of revocable labor contract, which starts with the concept of revocable labor contract. Based on the basic principles of labor law and the particularity of labor relations, the contradiction between revocable labor contract and labor relationship is deeply analyzed, and the two theories are analyzed. The third chapter is the improvement of the relevant provisions of the Labor contract Law. This chapter begins with the definition of the right to revoke the labor contract and the unilateral right to rescind the labor contract. This paper analyzes the rationality of the relevant provisions of the Labor contract Law, and then points out the deficiencies of the existing provisions and puts forward some suggestions for perfection.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.52

【引证文献】