矿山安全事故中的监督过失责任

发布时间：2018-02-03 10:21

本文关键词： 矿山安全事故监督过失过失竞合信赖原则共同过失　出处：《中国政法大学》2006年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：监督过失理论的原产地在日本,我国刑法理论中并无此概念。但是,相关法律以及以往的刑事判例在追究安全责任事故相关责任人员的过失责任时,无疑都运用了这一理论。近年来,我国矿山安全事故频繁发生,死亡人数之巨,财产损失之大,成为世界之最。矿山安全事故的发生,是多种原因的综合体,不能企求以追究责任人员刑事责任的这种事后补救方式予以根本的解决,这是不现实的。但是,法律作以严格地规范,杜绝安全事故的发生是预防和控制矿难这一系统工程所不可或缺的重要组成部分。近年来许多的责任人员被追究责任,实际上仍然是运用了监督过失的理论。为了能够准确、有力的追究责任人员的刑事责任,结合矿山生产的实际情况和特殊性,借鉴和提倡日本刑法理论上的监督过失理论,明确安全生产监督者的监督过失责任,确定责任承担的主体,加大惩处的力度,从而做到有责必究。文章共分五章,其篇章结构如下: 第一章监督过失的概念。本章通过对日本刑法理论的考察,日本刑法学界对监督过失的探讨是从过失竞合开始的。但对过失竞合的理解,中日刑法学界尚存不同的见解;监督过失与共同过失似有异曲同工之妙,但却只是“外形相似”本质相去甚远;监督过失存在广义与狭义的区分,广义的监督过失包含管理的过失,本文所探讨的仅限于狭义的监督过失。第二章我国现行法律对监督过失的规定及相关判例。我国现行相关法律、法规存在许多关于监督过失责任的法律规定,着重论述了刑法的规定。司法判例也为数不少,着重以克拉玛依大火案以及广东兴宁特
[Abstract]:The origin of the supervisory negligence theory is in Japan, but there is no such concept in the criminal law theory of our country. However, the relevant laws and previous criminal jurisprudence are investigating the negligence liability of the persons responsible for the safety accident. There is no doubt that this theory has been used. In recent years, mine safety accidents occur frequently in China, the death toll is huge, property loss is the most in the world. The occurrence of mine safety accidents is a complex of many reasons. It is not realistic to seek this kind of post-event remedy to investigate the criminal responsibility of the responsible personnel, which is unrealistic. However, the law is strictly regulated. Putting an end to the occurrence of safety accidents is an indispensable part of the system engineering of preventing and controlling mine accidents. In recent years, many responsible personnel have been investigated for responsibility. In fact, the theory of supervisory negligence is still used. In order to be able to accurately and powerfully investigate the criminal responsibility of the responsible personnel, combined with the actual situation and particularity of mine production. We should draw lessons from and advocate the theory of supervision negligence in Japanese criminal law, make clear the supervisory negligence responsibility of supervisors in production safety, determine the main body of responsibility, and increase the intensity of punishment. The article is divided into five chapters, the structure of the text is as follows: The first chapter is the concept of supervisory negligence. This chapter through the investigation of the Japanese criminal law theory, the Japanese criminal law circles to the supervision fault is from the fault concurrence, but the understanding to the fault concurrence. There are still different opinions in the field of criminal law between China and Japan; The supervision fault and the joint fault may have the same work, but only "the appearance similarity" essence is very different; There is a distinction between the broad sense and the narrow sense of the supervision fault. The broad supervision fault includes the management fault, which is only limited to the narrow sense of the supervision fault. In the second chapter, there are many legal provisions on the liability of supervision negligence in the current laws and regulations of our country. This article mainly discusses the provisions of the criminal law. The judicial precedents are also quite large, with emphasis on the Karamay fire case and the Guangdong Xingningte case.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D922.54

【引证文献】